On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we met to discuss schedule and scope of the meeting today.
I was thinking of something along the lines of regular afternoon presentations (including talk proposals that should really come up before Jan) and a longer planning discussion. > Monday 17 - Hackfest. Mel: might be a good time to do a "so, > coders in Boston, you've wanted to learn how to help out This would be hard for Monday. But the following weekend might work. (Saturday?) > Thursday 20 - Technical planning. Scott: I want to leave saying > something like: "9.1 is going to have a new journal (implemented by > cscott), improved security (implemented by mstone). Secondary > objectives, if we have time or find additional help, will be better > networking (cscott), better tools (mstone)". >From the recent thread about a set of sugar discussion sessions in Cambridge the week of nov 17: > Thursday 20 - Technical planning. Scott: I want to leave saying > something like: "9.1 is going to have a new journal (implemented > by > cscott), improved security (implemented by mstone). > Secondary objectives, if we have time or find additional help, will > be better networking (cscott), better tools (mstone)". This sounds a bit absolute, given the low key nature of the week... how will this series of presentations mesh with Greg's iterative efforts to set roadmap milestones and points? That said, I would be happy to see time used for roadmap-coordination discussions. There are questions about how we will manage builds for different audiences, and upstream/downstream issues generally... perhaps we can focus more (wed and thu) on those, and how SL, OLPC and specific XO communities can collaborate on [distinct] roadmaps. SJ _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
