On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
Awesome, how much time would it take to get implemented? Thanks, Tomeu > On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a >>> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could >>> administer by ourselves. >> >>> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and >>> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC >>> hardware. >> >> I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar >> developers who want it. Shall we just do that instead? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Chris. >> -- >> Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
