On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more > standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a > standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in place of > some of the custom solutions used now (xmlrpc instead of dbus perhaps?). I > would also like to talk about using the colaboration API to talk to external > services not on the jabber network(a moodle server for instance). As well as > a possibly a few API changes to make these sorts of services easier to access > for activity developers. > > Having a standards base and flexible collaboration framework that extends > beyond the sugar ecosystem offers some very interesting possibilities. I > would also like to discuss some of the jabber scalability problems, as well > as how we manage grouping students into classes, and collaborating with other > schools over the internet. > > If people thinks this is a good idea for discussion I will add it to the wiki.
I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability. I'm also quite curious about how Sugar runs in a LTSP environment and the challenges we can find there, so maybe Resara could talk a bit about that as well? Thanks, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
