C. Scott Ananian wrote: > Please reserve the 3pm-5pm Thursday time slot for the roadmap meeting; > I've gotten people to clear their schedules for that slot already.
I've left it there, and split it in two parts: 15-17: Brainstorm: OLPC 9.1 draft roadmap and priorities 17-19 Brainstorm: Sugar 0.84 roadmap and priorities Ed McNierney is leading the first, Marco the second. The Sugar roadmap comes last so we can use the OLPC requirements as input for finer-grained tasks impacting Sugar. I know you'll find this split controversial, but this is what a lot of people asked for. I also think defining independent -- but interoperable -- roadmaps will result in higher quality results. We can ensure that periodic (or continuous) integration is part of the equation. >> I would decompress the talks on multiple days, keeping into account >> that the OLPC developers might have to leave at any time to assist >> with G1G1. > > I'd prefer the Wed talks not be decompressed. But +1 on claiming > other slots via wiki. How about moving talks that are less interesting to OLPC people to Monday and Tueday? I'm thinking things like Sugar Labs Infrastructure, etc. Secondly, I suppose Tuesday after hours, when OLPC employees could attend freely, would be a good time to reallocate more of those talks. Also, what are these talks with no title you scheduled Tuesday after dinner? 1900 Marco Gritti / Michael Stone 2000 C. Scott Ananian / Tomeu Vizoso -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
