Hi All,
I'm new to the SUMO and have a question about the Junction shape vector.
Is it always true that the junction shape vector information myPoly[] always
corresponds to the myAllEdges[] information, in the clockwise order?
E.g. I have a 4-leg intersection attached.
gneJ6 has myPoly[]:
+ [0] {myX=27.776691366879319 myY=64.815683253696932
myZ=0.00000000000000000 } Position+ [1]
{myX=27.881282924069154 myY=58.316524800007372 myZ=0.00000000000000000 }
Position+ [2] {myX=26.396169209436358 myY=56.792460240963649
myZ=0.00000000000000000 } Position+ [3]
{myX=19.896481010770131 myY=56.728794550682863 myZ=0.00000000000000000 }
Position+ [4] {myX=17.817629875222266 myY=58.462324909907935
myZ=0.00000000000000000 } Position+ [5]
{myX=18.094585931508277 myY=64.956421871217216 myZ=0.00000000000000000 }
Position+ [6] {myX=19.484118555429102 myY=66.388535696013193
myZ=0.00000000000000000 } Position+ [7]
{myX=25.966901185831048 myY=66.861324620332340 myZ=0.00000000000000000 }
Position
And gneJ6 has myAllEdges[]:[0] Named {myID="gneE6" }[1]
Named {myID="gneE7" }[2] Named {myID="gneE9" }[3]
Named {myID="gneE8" }[4] Named {myID="gneE4" }[5]
Named {myID="gneE5" }[6] Named {myID="gneE11" }[7]
Named {myID="gneE10" }
Is it always true that myPoly[0] maps to myAllEdges[0] and goes clockwise, at
last myPoly[7] maps to myAllEdges[7]?
Sorry for my poor English and cheers.
Thanks,
Zeng
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
sumo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-devel