Dear Dominik, Am 17.03.2017 um 10:12 schrieb Dominik S. Buse: > wouldn't it then make sense to integrate support for a protocol based on > a more widespread framework, e.g., google protocol buffers or msgpack, > into the system? This should easen the process of adapting more > languages and environments, increase flexibility for future updates, and > possibly even increase speed.
you are perfectly right, but once we have a stable C++ API (not as a TraCI client but really as a library) this should be superior in speed to all RPC solutions and should allow linking more languages via swig, which we are planning to do. We already had a look at grpc (using protocol buffers) but this is not something we are going to implement soon. So the goal is to provide an API to program and link against with different languages but with comparable functionality as TraCI. If you need remote calls however you will probably be stuck with the current TraCI for some time unless someone else does the job, which we would happily welcome! Best regards, Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ sumo-devel mailing list sumo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-devel
