The problem flowrouter has to solve in a city network is strongly underdetermined. There are plenty of knobs and dials to improve the result (among other things you can forbid explicit routes O/D-pairs. You could also try cadyts which adapts demand levels to detectors for a pre-determined set of routes: https://people.kth.se/~gunnarfl/cadyts.html https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Contributed/Cadyts https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318418803_SUMO-Cadyts_calibration_with_limited_data_quality
regards, Jakob Am Mi., 20. März 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Kevin Malena < [email protected]>: > Hey… > > > > I want to validate detected data in a sumo network of my city (at > different spots i placed sensors to detect every incoming and outgoing > vehicle with speed, arrival time and type). > > I triedto use flowrouter, but the generated routes don’t really fit the > data. > > Right now I implement a combination of the generated routes and flows by > flowrouter with the ‚dynamic‘ calibrators using route probes (see docu: > Building a scenario without knowledge of routes, based on flow > measurements). > > Do you know about a different method like flowrouter which is more precise? > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
