Hello a) There is currently no supported way to declare edges as connector and I recommend against manually editing the net.file. To achieve a visual distinction there are other options: - set a small width value for these edges (width is ignored unless you are doing sublane simulation) - set a specific permission flag (i.e. disable vClass "custom1") and then color 'by permissions'
b) edges only interact where they share a common junction. You do not need to worry about z-values when only the geometries intersect. regards, Jakob Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 12:43 Uhr schrieb Thanos Tasakos < [email protected]>: > Hello Jacob, > thank you for your instructions. I managed to define the shape of the > non-geometrical edge and produced the following network > [image: image.png] > a) I set the function for the non-gemometrical edge as "connector" > (manually to the net file, is there a more clever way to do that?) in order > to distinguish it from the "normal" edges of the network. > Is it possible to not show that edge at all in sumo-gui as it is somewhat > confusing. > b) If i have many such non geometrical edges (set to 0.1 m), they may > intersect. If that happens sumo considers them to be on the same plane and > creates an intersection at the point those edges meet. > I would like these edges to be considered at different height so that they > dont intersect. Can i do that by specifying the z parameter of the edges' > shape. > > Thank you in advance. > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:59 AM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> I suppose the FAQ advice for creating non-geometrical loop was >> misleading. My suggestion is, that you define an edge with sensible >> geometry (i.e. a big detour loop around the central intersection (so the >> geometry will look fine) and then declare it's length to be 0.1m. >> Reason: netconvert will always compute geometry and if edges intersect at >> strange angles the network will look like a mess. (An alternative would be >> to manually define the geometry of the border junctions. >> >> regards, >> Jakob >> >> Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 03:43 Uhr schrieb Thanos Tasakos < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> Good evening, >>> i came across a peculiar bug when i try to close a network in a non >>> geometrical way. If i specify the edge length as 0.1, as said in >>> documentation it throws a warning "junction shape is to far away from the >>> original node position" and results in the second photo. The only >>> difference between the first and second network is that in the second case >>> i specify 4 extra edges (from top to bottom, bottom to top, left to right >>> and right to left) and set them to 0.1 length. >>> >>> >>> [image: image.png] >>> [image: image.png] >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sumo-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
