Maybe this xml format would be more correct:
"" <routes>
   <route id="route_0" edges="beg middle end rend" />
   <route id="route_1" edges="beg middle2 end rend" />
   <vehicle id="0" type="type1" depart="0">
      <routeDistribution>
        <route route="route_0" probability="0.1" />
        <route route="route_1" probability="0.9" />
      </routeDistribution>
</routes> ""

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:02 PM Theophile Cabannes <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thank you a lot Maria,
> Then I am a little bit confused, Why would
> "" <routes>
>    <route id="route_0" edges="beg middle end rend" />
>    <route id="route_1" edges="beg middle2 end rend" />
>    <vehicle id="0" type="type1" depart="0">
>       <routeDistribution>
>         <route id="route_0" probability="0.1" />
>         <route id="route_1" probability="0.9" />
>       </routeDistribution>
> </routes> ""
> work (as Jakob mentioned)?
>
> Restating my question: can I use route distribution using routes that
> have been already defined in the route file?
>
> In other works, is there a route attribute in the route element to not
> have to redefine the edges attribute used by the route element everytime I
> would like to assign a different probability attribute to the given route
> element?
>
> Thank you a lot for your help!
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:56 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> no, it is not the same. Your second option is not right. If you already
>> defined a route, then you only need to add the “route” attribute to your
>> vehicle element.
>>
>> <routes>
>>
>>     <route id="route0" color="1,1,0" edges="beg middle end rend"/>
>>
>>     <vehicle id="0" route="route0" depart="0" color="1,0,0"/>
>>
>> </routes>
>>
>>
>>
>> Your second example would be possible, if you are defining a new route as
>> a child of your vehicle, like this:
>>
>> <routes>
>>
>>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0" color="1,0,0">
>>
>>        <route edges="beg middle end rend"/>
>>
>>     </vehicle>
>>
>> </routes>
>>
>>
>>
>> See
>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#vehicles_and_routes
>>
>>
>>
>> With routeDistribution, the definition of the routes according to the
>> docu would be:
>>
>>
>>
>> <routes>
>>
>>     <routeDistribution id="routedist1">
>>
>>          <route id="route_0" edges="beg middle end rend"
>> probability="0.1" />
>>
>>          <route id="route_1" edges="beg middle2 end rend"
>> probability="0.9" />
>>
>>     </routeDistribution>
>>
>>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0" route="routedist1"/>
>>
>> </routes>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Giuliana
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *Im
>> Auftrag von *Theophile Cabannes
>> *Gesendet:* Montag, 9. November 2020 15:10
>> *An:* Sumo project User discussions <[email protected]>
>> *Betreff:* Re: [sumo-user] Use predefined routes in route distribution
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Giuliana,
>>
>> However
>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#route_distributions
>> is a little bit different as the routes in the route distributions in the
>> example is not predefined outside the route distribution itself (i.e. the
>> routes contain the attribute edges).
>>
>>
>>
>> If I can do what I have suggested, then I guess that the two following
>> route files will be understand the same way:
>>
>> <routes>
>>
>>     <route id="route0" color="1,1,0" edges="beg middle end rend"/>
>>
>>     <vehicle id="0" route="route0" depart="0" color="1,0,0"/>
>>
>> </routes>
>>
>>
>>
>> end
>>
>>
>>
>> <routes>
>>
>>     <route id="route0" color="1,1,0" edges="beg middle end rend"/>
>>
>>     <vehicle id="0" depart="0" color="1,0,0">
>>
>>        <route id="route0" />
>>
>>     </vehicle>
>>
>> </routes>
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this correct?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you a lot!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:05 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Theo,
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes it is possible, see
>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#route_distributions
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Giuliana
>>
>> *Von:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *Im
>> Auftrag von *Theophile Cabannes
>> *Gesendet:* Montag, 9. November 2020 13:39
>> *An:* [email protected]
>> *Betreff:* [sumo-user] Use predefined routes in route distribution
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to use route distribution using routes that have been
>> already defined in the route file. Is this possible?
>> I was thinking about writting something like:
>>  <routes>
>>    <route id="route_0" edges="beg middle end rend" />
>>    <route id="route_1" edges="beg middle2 end rend" />
>>    <vehicle id="0" type="type1" depart="0">
>>       <routeDistribution>
>>         <route id="route_0" probability="0.1" />
>>         <route id="route_1" probability="0.9" />
>>       </routeDistribution>
>> </routes>
>> Would that work?
>>
>> Thank you a lot!
>> Theo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to