This is because the traci library version does not match the sumo version
(1.9.0 has 10 instead of 9 reservation parameters).
Compare /usr/share/sumo/tools/traci/_person.py with the 1.9.0 version:
https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/0d34f1f23bdec0abd25a8b61dc21433b4208bbff/tools/traci/_person.py

Am Mi., 21. Apr. 2021 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Roessler, Andreas <
[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m using the example
>
> /tests/complex/traci/vehicle/taxi/basic/runner.py
>
>
>
> The very STRANGE fact:
>
> the example runs without error on one computer (Ubuntu 20, sumo 1.9.0,
> 32GB RAM)
>
>
>
> On another computer (VM, same OS, same sumo version, 4GB) I get:
>
>
>
> Retrying in 1 seconds
>
> Loading configuration ... done.
>
> ***Starting server on port 50661 ***
>
> Loading net-file from 'input_net4.net.xml' ... done (12ms).
>
> Loading done.
>
> Simulation version 1.9.0 started with time: 0.00
>
> taxiFleet ('taxi_0',)
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
>   File "runner.py", line 61, in <module>
>
>     reservations = traci.person.getTaxiReservations(0)
>
>   File "/usr/share/sumo/tools/traci/_person.py", line 246, in
> getTaxiReservations
>
>     result.append(_readReservation(answer))
>
>   File "/usr/share/sumo/tools/traci/_person.py", line 63, in
> _readReservation
>
>     assert(result.read("!i")[0] == 9)
>
> AssertionError
>
> Error: tcpip::Socket::recvAndCheck @ recv: peer shutdown
>
> Quitting (on error).
>
> DijkstraRouter answered 1 queries and explored 1.00 edges on average.
>
> DijkstraRouter spent 0.00s answering queries (0.00ms on average).
>
>
>
> Any ideas how to fix this are highly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Andreas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to