There is only the code:
https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/64a041537ce537690f5a22edcc46ef40df8d5fa0/src/marouter/ROMAAssignments.cpp#L115-L163

astar should work fine with marouter default options. Which options are you
passing?

Am Mo., 17. Mai 2021 um 12:02 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini <[email protected]>:

> Thank for the explanation. Are there any documents to help me make a
> realistic guesstimation of travel times? What I see in the course code is  
> travelTime
> = capacityConstraintFunction(edge, newFlow / intervalLengthInHours);
> and thought travel times are directly exportable from Marouter. What is
> the exact form of the capacityConstraintFunction? I think I can extract
> densities from the netload file, but to calculate travel times I need to
> know the function. The network is too big to run sumo even in the
> mesoscopic model.
> One other issue I noticed was that no matter which router I give to
> Marouter, in the end, I always get the message Dijksrarouter has answered
> the queries. I think in the current implementation only the Dijsktra router
> is working (could be related to:
> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/6935)?
>
> Thanks,
> Sasan
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:08 AM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The issue with fromJunction and toJunction is now fixed.
>>
>> The route costs in marouter are travel times multiplied with a
>> traffic-density dependent capacityConstraintFunction.
>> The actual travel time can only be guessed at at this point since it will
>> depend on vehicle interactions. To compute empty-network travel times you
>> can pass the marouter-routes to duarouter. If you need more realistic
>> traveltimes, simulate with sumo.
>>
>> Am Fr., 14. Mai 2021 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini <[email protected]
>> >:
>>
>>> True, the scale parameter works perfectly fine. I am not sure if I was
>>> testing it on a nightly build version of 1.8.x, but now on 1.9.0 it works.
>>> However, the fromJunction - toJunction option for route files is not
>>> working, while it works perfectly fine in DUAROUTER. Moreover, for the
>>> output of MAROUTER  I was under the impression that route costs are travel
>>> times (since the weight attribute is by default traveltime) but I get
>>> values that are much larger than traveltime,  maybe distance in meters? Is
>>> this cost in MAROUTER modifiable i.e. to get travel time of each trip?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Sasan
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:19 AM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Scaling route file input is supposed to work since 1.9.0 (and it's
>>>> working in our test). Can you send me a minimal failing example for 1.9 or
>>>> later?
>>>>
>>>> Am Sa., 1. Mai 2021 um 14:46 Uhr schrieb Sasan Amini <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am running MAROUTER on an extremely large network and have only 1%
>>>>> of the real demand, which means I have to scale it by a factor of 100.
>>>>> However, when I define demand as route file and apply the --scale option,
>>>>> it has no impact on the number of loaded vehicles. When I try to define
>>>>> demand as flows, no valid vehicles are loaded. Any suggestion on how to
>>>>> scale demand when using MAROUTER? or even a better way to downscale
>>>>> capacity (similar to MATSim)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Sasan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to