1. This can only be answered by looking at individual conflicts that were classified differently. Since both classifications are (by necessity) based on thresholds, small differences in computation can have a large impact on results. 2. SSM device classifies conflicts by road topology: https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/SSM_Device.html#conflict_types
Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 09:38 Uhr schrieb amir kr <[email protected]>: > Hello everyone, > I have two questions about the SSM device. > 1. What is the difference between SSAM software and SSM device. Because I > run a simulation and put TTC = 1.5 and PET = 5 but I got different results. > For example, SSAM showed 600 conflicts but the SSM device showed 800 > conflicts > 2. How SSM devices classify conflict types without considering the angle. > Because I did not see any information about the angle in ( > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/SSM_Device.html). > For example, SSAM software gives the user this opportunity to choose the > angle and its classification is based on the angle of vehicles. > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
