> the SL2015 LC model combined with Krauss CF model makes for some unrealistic lane changing when faced with a blockage in a 2-lane condition (slides laterally to lanes when there's no space to accelerate in front).
This is a general issue of SL2015 and not limited to Krauss. You can may be able to prevent sliding by setting lcMacSpeedLatStanding=0 > Both ACC and CACC seem to be more realistic and intelligent. Are these modeled close to the state-of-the-art systems that self-driving vehicles use currently for cruise control? I'd say no. The models were developed/tested for a rather narrow range of applications and are known to behave badly (i.e. collide) outside that range. To learn more, please refer to the publications linked in their documentation. I you need a model that is more sophisticated than Krauss, take a look at https://sumo.dlr.de/userdoc/Car-Following-Models/EIDM.html regards, Jakob Am Di., 5. Apr. 2022 um 01:15 Uhr schrieb Hriday Sanghvi via sumo-user < [email protected]>: > Hello, > > I have noticed that the Krauss CF model seems to outperform other models > like IDM, ACC and CACC in terms of total simulation time for all vehicles > to reach the end of their journey. But the SL2015 LC model combined with > Krauss CF model makes for some unrealistic lane changing when faced with a > blockage in a 2-lane condition (slides laterally to lanes when there's no > space to accelerate in front). > > Both ACC and CACC seem to be more realistic and intelligent. Are these > modelled close to the state-of-the-art systems that self-driving vehicles > use currently for cruise control? > > Thank you. > > Sincerely, > Hriday. > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
