Hi, Thanks for your reply Best Regards,
*Kenny Delgado Assunção* *4º Ano Engenharia Informática e Telecomunicações* *Universidade Técnica do Atlântico - UTA* *Instituto de Engenharia e Ciências do Mar - ISECMAR* Tel / Whatsapp: +238 9895363 Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kennyassuncao/ On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:22 PM Michael Behrisch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > the answers are inline. > > Am 25.09.22 um 14:57 schrieb UTA - Std - Kenny Assunção: > > I saw that there is an error percentage > > associated with each type of emission, I would like to know if this > > error percentage is relative to reality or is it relative to the old > > model (HBEFA3). > > The error shows how good our (polynomial) fit resembles the original > HBEFA4 data. This is just an average over all speeds and accelerations > in the range where HBEFA has values, so this does not mean that any > standardized driving cycle will show this error. > > > The second question is about the emission class "Energy", the class for > > electric vehicles, the noise values for the electric cars simulated are > > practically the same or even higher than fuel cars, maybe this doesn't > > make sense. > > The noise model currently does not take the propulsion method into > account. It is tailored for combustion engines only. I opened an issue > here: https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/11767 > > Best regards, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
