If you suggest, I can share my scenario files with you. Meanwhile, kindly
tell me if this is correct: "If we aggregate all the edges in the edgeData
file, then the average speed should be the same as that obtained through
SUMO."
Thanks,

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:31 PM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's hard to tell without seeing the traffic patterns but there could be
> complex interactions due to intersections and whatever the rerouters are
> doing. Observing the scenario while it runs is usually the best way to
> figure these things out. It also helps to set vehicle coloring to "by
> speed".
>
> Am Do., 22. Dez. 2022 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb 191 000 <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> I have attached a screenshot for your reference.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:12 PM 191 000 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have rechecked all my edges, and all the units are in m/s. The
>>> simulation scenario is for 39600-time steps, where initially vehicles enter
>>> from one edge and get out at another, travelling with maximum allowable
>>> speed but only using some of the edges of the network. After about 3600
>>> timesteps, a few more vehicles enter, but now they use all the edges and
>>> may slow down or stop based on traffic conditions. In this scenario, the
>>> average speed for initial 3600 timesteps, the average speed is around
>>> 3-4m/s, while after 3600, it goes up to 7-8m/s, which I find
>>> counterintuitive. Hence I tried matching it with edgeData file values.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:04 PM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This sounds like a km/h vs m/s mismatch. If you define your edges with
>>>> 16km/h than the average speed would typically be a bit lower i.e. ~14 km/h
>>>> (due to random slow-downs and interactions of vehicles with different
>>>> desired speeds). This would then be presented to you by sumo as ~3.8 m/s .
>>>>
>>>> Am Do., 22. Dez. 2022 um 06:45 Uhr schrieb 191 000 <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>> Regarding the previous discussion on average speeds in SUMO, I have
>>>>> encountered another setback. Earlier I was using SUMO-GUI to generate a
>>>>> graph of the average speed of the whole network (at 5-minute intervals) 
>>>>> and
>>>>> save it as a CSV file. Then I thought that if I got aggregated average
>>>>> speed of all the edges in the network, it should be equal to the values
>>>>> obtained from SUMO-GUI, but this is not the case. Could you explain how 
>>>>> the
>>>>> average speed for the whole network is calculated and how I can get the
>>>>> same values through the edgeData file?
>>>>> I wanted to compare these values as even though I had a max allowable
>>>>> speed of 16 and the vehicles were free-flowing, the average speed in
>>>>> SUMO-GUI would be around 3-4.
>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>> Rohan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 2:11 PM Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The speed value is computed as travelledDistance / sampledSeconds.
>>>>>> You should be able to replicate the aggregated speed value by the
>>>>>> following procedure:
>>>>>> - for each edge compute travelled distances as speed * sampledSeconds
>>>>>> - sum up  the distances and sampledSeconds
>>>>>> - take the quotient of the sums
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Di., 13. Dez. 2022 um 09:23 Uhr schrieb 191 000 <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been trying to understand how the average speed is
>>>>>>> calculated in edge-based traffic measures. I know it is space-mean speed
>>>>>>> but I am trying to aggregate data for multiple edges.
>>>>>>> I first generated average speed of two edges using edges="" and
>>>>>>> aggregate="True" method, then I generated average speed of the two edges
>>>>>>> separately. Now, I have tried arithmetic mean, harmonic mean, weighted
>>>>>>> average by numbers but cannot get the value equal to the aggregated 
>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>> given by SUMO.
>>>>>>> Kindly suggest in what way can I manually aggregate the average
>>>>>>> speed data so as to get same value as when being done by aggregating
>>>>>>> directly through SUMO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>> Rohan
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to