Dear Mirko, I used the tripinfo output to obtain "duration" for each vehicle and then took an arithmetic average of all the vehicles. From 30 to 100, the average time decreased by 0.45%, 100 to 200: increased by 0.08%, 200 to 400: 0.88%, 400 to 600: 1.15%, 600 to 800: 1.34%, 800 to 1000: 1.95%, 1000 to 1200: 2.86% and 1200 to 1600: 0.15%.
Thanks and regards, Rohan On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:16 PM Mirko Barthauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Rohan, > > > > this sounds strange indeed. Can you add some information on how you got > the average travel time / which output you used? And how much does the > average travel time change? > > > > Best regards > > Mirko > > > > > > > > -----Original-Nachricht----- > > Betreff: [sumo-user] Average Travel times > > Datum: 2023-12-10T07:53:12+0100 > > Von: "Rohan Verma via sumo-user" <[email protected]> > > An: "Sumo project User discussions" <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Dear community, > I have a simple grid network and one route. I created a flow on that > route. When I increase the flow rate from 30 vehicles per hour to 100 > vehicles per hour, there is a decrease in average travel time (opposite to > intuition that as the number of vehicles increases, the travel time should > also increase). However after 100 till 1200, the average travel time > increases. But from 1200 to 1600, the travel times are almost constant even > though there is no visible congestion (however, there was a backlog of > vehicles to enter the simulation). Could someone please explain the > reason for this? or is this related to how SUMO works? > Thanks and regards, > Rohan > >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
