Hi Jakob

I managed to get it work by not applying any processing options on the first 
conversion from .osm to SUMO .net using the latest svn. 
Then applying required processing to the resulting .net. Maybe a memory issue 
when converting large .osm with processing. 

Ben 

________________________________________
From: Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>
Sent: 04 September 2015 7:22 AM
To: Ben Postance; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] polyconvert projection

Dear Ben,
I've opened up a ticket: http://sumo.dlr.de/trac.wsgi/ticket/1878
I suppose it's a bug triggered by importing data across multiple UTM zones or
somethink along those lines.
You could help to pin it down by trying to create a small data set which
triggers the bug.
Somethink like taking the whole scotland area and filtering it with OSMOSIS
http://learnosm.org/en/osm-data/osmosis/ to only include motorways (The smaller
the better).
regards,
Jakob

On 09/03/2015 03:53 PM, Ben Postance wrote:
>
> I have done some testing using the latest  dev-SVN-r18771 and 0.24 (64 bit 
> windows).
>
> When I use a small city sized .osm extract from overpass api to create a 
> network the projection / coordinates work with polyconvert.
>
> When I use the Scotland (what I need) osm.bz2 data from 
> http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain.html
> it does not work.
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ben Postance <[email protected]>
> Sent: 03 September 2015 12:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [sumo-user] polyconvert projection
>
> Hi
>
> I have created a net using OSM import with default projection parameters 
> (WGS84).
>
> I have a shape file of areas I wish to use for TAZ also in WGS84.
>
> I convert the shapefile to .poly with polyconvert.
>
> Yet in sumo-gui the net displays at around -66 latitude whereas the polygon 
> is at the correct 55 degree latitude.
>
>
> I assumed all default projections were in WGS84 yet this does not seem to be 
> the case. Is there an option I need to pass for the net or poly in netconvert 
> or polyconvert?
>
>
> Thank you in advance
>
>
> Ben
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> in one place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> in one place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to