+++ Michael Behrisch [2016-03-19 17:02 +0100]: > Hi Wookey, > thanks for caring about SUMO on ARM. I always wanted to try this myself too. > > Am 19.03.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Wookey:
> > And everything except the openlayers patch looks suitable for upstream to > > me. > > I tend to disagree. OK, your reasoning is all sensible. I admit that I didn't look at the patches very hard :-) Reviewing them was the main thing, so thanks for doing that. It's fine for you to find them only relevant to the distro builds. > 10...) Internal GL2PS is easier for us because then it is ready for the > windows platform as well and we always have identical results. I don't > mind debian excluding it, but I don't think we should incorporate it in > the main line. OK, but an internal library copy is always a bad idea on Linux, even if it's expedient on Windows due to the lack of a packaging system. It'd be nice if the build DTRT on linux, but I can see that that may involve more work in platform I.D. (I've not looked at the codebase to see if this would be a pain or not). > 20...) I don't see why a shebang should be added to files which are not > executable and not meant to be executed, furthermore this patch removes > some files from examples Ah, OK. I had assumed that they were real scripts. They look like python scripts...So they are just intended to be loaded/referenced by other scripts, I guess? I expect this is due to Debian QA tools complaining about scripts with no shebang. The patch looks like it adds files to examples, rather than removing them? (No idea if this is sensible). > 30...) I doubt that GL- and pthread-libraries are connected with > Xerces-c. In my build environment those get added when using fox-config > and we use threading and GL only when we use fox. Any idea why they are > useful in other cases? Sorry, No. This would be something to ask Anton. It fixed a build failure, but I don't know if it's actually a good/best fix. > > If you have any further questions about arm support or being a good > > upstream from a distro and 'the world is more than just x86' point of > > view, I am happy to help. > > I would love to add an ARM build to our nightly builds. Can you > recommend a distro / VM setup to use? Well, I would tend to say Debian just because arm is a 1st-class citizen there, so everything works exactly the same for Debian on armhf/arm64 as on x86. But whatever you are used to might be a more significant consideration. What hardware do you have? Or were you looking at using OBS? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
