Jean-Paul, Thanks for the information on Slate Dials. This is 
a different perspective and certainly is encouraging to dialist.
Slate is readily available in San Diego CA at a tile and glass outlet.
I may look into this some more. 
Tad Dunne replied about using glass as a substrate and I believe that
the NASS published an article using glass. It is certainly easy to 
"frost" using the grit blasting technique. There is a quite a bit of 
info on the web concerning "sand Carving". http://www.rayzist.com is the
web site of a company local to my area which provides materials
and services to provide photopolymer blast masks for this industry. I 
have talked to their personel and they informed me that they have
generated 
masks and blasting for I believe a large granite mural in a Chicago Post
Office. This methode is rather "brute force" but the results are
predictable in the hands of an experienced operator. I also believe that
these techniques are also used in the manufacture of burial monuments.

Bob

Jean-Paul Cornec wrote:
> 
>         About a comparison between different sorts of
> stones for sundial carving, sundials of Brittany
> in the west part of  France are pretty
> instructive. The region is rich with granite and
> slate, and hundreds of dials are currently known.
> The oldest sundials, dating back to the middle of
> 16th century, are mostly carved on granite and
> very few on slate. But from the very end of 16th
> century on, carvers and dialists have totally
> given up granite for slate. First because of the
> bad resistance of granite to weathering. The few
> remaining granite sundials look "erased" and
> almost illegible, and they are vertical dials not
> horizontal. And next because of  the possibility
> of easily cutting plates with any desired shape,
> and of easy and  very fine and beautiful carving
> : some slate dials are really masterpieces. You
> don't need special or heavy tools to carve slate
> (or at least most of the varieties). Slate
> resists much better to weathering, because, I
> think, of its layer structure;  for instance
> don't forget  that frost has no effect on slate
> (in french it is said to be "ingélif" but I don't
> know the english word for it). Existing dials,
> even from 16th century, can be read as if they
> have been carved last year. It is always amazing
> to discover on a 1580 slate dial the slight lines
> (less than 1 mm deep !) the dialist had drawn on
> the plate to fix the place of the hours line,
> digits or decoration before beginning to carve.
> Granit lasts long but slate lasts even longer.
>         Another point. It is a spread , but quite false,
> opinion that contrast of shadow on a slate plate
> is low. It is quite the opposite : the shadow of
> a style is very well visible, it is always darker
> than slate surface that is never very dark but
> more or less gray. The 500 or so slate dials
> still remaining in Brittany (and in north-east of
> France also) are living instances of this easy
> reading.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jean-Paul Cornec
> 22300 LANNION
> FRANCE
> 48°44'24" N  -  3°27'26"W

Reply via email to