On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The millinium does technically begin on Jan 1, 2001 because there is no year
> 0. On the other hand if you celebrated a new decade in 1990, then it would
> start in 2000. 2000 does look like more of a significant change than
> 2000-2001, and of course no one alive was around in year 0 anyway.
> In addition, Jesus of Nazarath was not born in year 1 anyway, but at
> least 4 years before that. (No one knows for sure)
> So, technically 2000 is Y2K,
> and 2001 is the new millenium.
and ~1996 WAS the Millenium of prophecy.
Did *you* notice anything happening?
Dave
