Dear All,

I'm afraid I've only just got back from a short holiday and so am a bit
late in tossing my two penn'orth into the fountain...

I'm actually studying a solids and fluids course with the Open University
at the moment and have just finished the fluids part (2 assignments due in
next week), so should be about as capable as I'll ever be of tackling this
question.

For simplicity, consider the hose vertical and aligned to the centre of the
bucket.  This will set up a flow that goes down the middle of the bucket,
radial out when it gets to the bottom, up the sides and radially back in to
the middle at the top (roughly speaking).  When the hose is inserted into
the middle, it is basically being put into a liquid that is flowing
vertically down - what is happening in the rest of the bucket I believe is
relatively incidental.

Tony mentioned that his hose had a jet attachment that fitted onto the
pipe, and I think this is the crucial bit.  If typical of such attachments
it will be of a larger diameter than the pipe, probably twice the size, and
increase in diameter in a series of steps, each perpendicular to the pipe. 
This means that fluid flowing along the outside of the pipe is then
presented with a bluff (un-streamlined) body when it meets the back end of
the jet attachment.  Drag on bluff bodies can be considerable and I suspect
that this accounts for the observed pull on the end of the pipe once it is
immersed in the flow.

This could be tested by removing the jet attachment and re-trying the
experiment with just the bare hose.  In this case there should be very
little pull (any drag would be due to surface drag along the side of the
hose).

If the above is the correct explanation, the effect should only be
particularly noticable once the jet attachment is fully immersed.  Indeed
it may need to be a little way into the liquid in order that some sort of
flow is established along the pipe before hitting the jet.

Not having a garden, I consequently have no garden hose either, so I shall
have to leave it to you to experiment on my behalf - I hope I don't end up
soaking too many of you through my suggestions!

I hope I'm not too far off the mark in this explanation - it could have
dire consequences come my exam in October!!

David Higgon

Reply via email to