I believe her name is Elizabeth Achelis, and I recall reading her books 
and a journal which she (and others) produced -- in the '50's, as I 
recall.  Now that you mention it, I, too have heard nothing about it for 
many years.
As I recall, one major objection was the introduction of a break in the 
sequence of week-days once a year, twice in leap years.  I don't think 
there was much serious consideration of the project in such places as the 
UN or the US Government at the time.
John

On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Cordasco, Anthony (NJ Data Services) wrote:

> I believe it was a very wealth woman (Greek?) who was behind the movement.
> She wrote two books on the subject. I read them and they were very
> interesting.  She presented quite a strong case for the calendar reform as
> well as giving a nice history of the calendar.  Her name and the titles of
> the books are at home and if no one else can answer your question I will
> submit them to you tomorrow.
> Regards,
> Anthony
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Bill Walton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:       Monday, March 01, 1999 7:30 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject:    Calendar Reform
> > 
> > Hi all,
> >         I'm new to this list (in fact, to any list at all) but I have
> > certainly enjoyed the threads on UTC, the 11 Days, The Abram's Sun Compass
> > (I think I have one put away somewhere) and the EoT.  Besides reading this
> > mail, how does one manage the barrage of information?  I've put excerpts
> > from the most pertinent to my interests into Word documents, but it's
> > beginning to overwhelm me.  Is any one archiving and indexeing this stuff?
> >         Now for a tangent from the "11 Days thread."  What ever happened
> > to
> > the World Calendar Reform?  The World Calendar was proposed in the 1930's
> > or
> > before, and taken up at the League of Nations. I also understand it was
> > considered in the early days of the United Nations.  1950, which began on
> > a
> > Sunday, was a target date for its adoption.
> >         The reform proposed a Calendar of 12 months, the first month of
> > each
> > quarter having 31 days, the other two having 30 days.  This makes all
> > quarters of equal length and takes up 364 days.  An intercalary day, "Year
> > End Day," is added at the end of the year to make it up to 365.  This day
> > belongs to no week and has no day-of-week designation so that every year
> > begins on a Sunday (or whatever day is appropriate for the year in which
> > it
> > might be adopted). "Leap Day" follows June 30 every 4 years, etc. and also
> > belongs to no week. Holidays, birthdays, would fall on the same day of the
> > week each year, and school calendars, etc., could be the same year after
> > year unless there were good reasons to change them.
> >         It always seemed like a good idea to me. (It would also put leap
> > day
> > in a more convenient place on the analemma!) I understand that through the
> > L
> > of N, or the UN, approval was obtained from many nations and most of the
> > world religious bodies.   Anyone know what happened to the idea and the
> > movement behind it?   
> > 
> > Bill Walton
> >         
> 

Reply via email to