Ron:

Don't have an answer except that there is hp-gl and hp-gl2.  I plot and
print to file and then view with no problem.  Also, the hp language is a
sudo standard and thus stable.  The 7580 and driver combination that I use
is about 20 years old.  The only thing that I have found that is sensitive
is the file extension.  Even though its a good hpgl file the extension has
to be one that is recognized by the reader.

Anyway, I am loading a new CAD system today and my first check as always is
plot, print and view.  I'll create a couple of test cases and send them to
you.

Steve I.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       


At 04:51 PM 4/7/00 -0700, Ron Anthony wrote:
>Steve,
>
>There is some confusion here, (and in the file conversion world) about HPGL
>which technically is a graphic language for the HP printers, and HP plotter
>files.  Bob's technique works for plotters or PLT type files.  I tried an
>HPGL dummy printer and none of my programs could view it.
>
>Now that we have it worked out for plotters, let's try HPGL.
>
>++ron
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Steve Irick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Steve Lelievre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sundial Mailing list
>Sundial <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 12:10 PM
>Subject: Re: DXF to HP plotter conversions
>
>
>> Steve:
>>
>> I just finished (gave up) evaluating several hpgl viewers.  I found none
>to
>> equal or even close to the quality of the hpgl... translator to PowerPnt,
>> Word, etc.  The first time I view these in a program I check to make sure
>> that it dosen't automatically stretch to fill the frame, which causes
>> distortion.  I use this routinely but, decided to check the viewers
>because
>> I sometimes get tired of chasing the Windows xxx changes.
>>
>> An overall solution (only if the program has the output of course) is CGM
>> (smart plotting), then it wouldn't matter what plotter or program.
>>
>> Email me the hpgl plot file and I'll run it through my process.
>> (when Bob mentioned 7585, I said; that mine too. I wiped the dust off of
>> the bat file and its 7580)
>>
>> I'll mention this just in case its related.  There is one plotting
>> (printing to be correct) problem that I have and I haven't figured out the
>> cause.  I have been going along fine for a long time with my 2D CAD and
>> Epson printer.  Very good color, very sharp lines and pretty much orients
>> the picture as I see it.   Then I loaded 98, several answering machine
>> programs, PS and Ill, digital camera prgms, etc.  Every one of these put
>in
>> a sudo printer.  Now I can't get a decent CAD print.  I tried a new HP, it
>> wouldn't even load.  A project for the rainy days.
>>
>> Steve I
>>
>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> At 11:42 AM 4/7/00 -0300, Steve Lelievre wrote:
>> >All,
>> >
>> >I too have tried Bob's method of diverting HPGL printout to a file. I
>then
>> >used an HPGL viewer to look at the resultant diagram.There's something
>odd
>> >which I don't understand: The original diagram uses several line width,
>the
>> >plot file lines all look the same. Also, the original diagram has neatly
>> >aligned Times New Roman text, in the HPGL plot it is not angled correctly
>> >and the font is wrong.
>> >
>> >Rather than loading your mailboxes with big attachments, I've posted
>screen
>> >snaps of the HPGL plot and the original DeltaCad drawing at
>> >http://www.glinx.com/~srgl/review
>> >
>> >(Ignore the differences in colours, I'm only worried about the shapes)
>> >
>> >Does anybody know why the differences occur? I though it might be a bug
>or
>> >other limitation of the viewer I was using, so I downloaded a second
>viewer.
>> >Both viewers give the same results.
>> >
>> >The newer viewer said the file is HPGL rather than HPGL2. Would that be a
>> >consequence of choosing HP 7585A as the printer type, or is the viewer
>> >wrong?
>> >
>> >Thanks, Steve
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to