A problem I have with email from individuals is that I don't recognize all the sundial senders so I am likely to just delete them without reading, on the assumption they are spam. However, if the "subject" is obviously related to dialing, I'll look at it.
Richard Mallett wrote: > Reply to : Fernando > > >> 1) Most of the time we DO want do respond to the sender only. It is > true that > sometimes people do not know it, but a good observation will clearly > show it. > For instance, request for information (any information) should > almost always > be responded to the sender only, not to list. Agressive answers should > be > sent to the sender only; reprimands should be sent to the sender only... > << > > I think it is very sad if people only use the facilities of this list > for personal 'one to one' communication. I would expect that, in a > moderated list such as this, that there would be very few aggressive > messages or reprimands, and requests for information (and responses to such > requests) would surely benefit everybody - isn't that what these discussion > lists are supposed to be all about ? I belong to about 30 lists on yahoo > groups, and about 15 lists on Compuserve, and all default to posting > replies to the list, so I don't really see the problem here. > > Richard. > > E-mail from: Richard Mallett, 07-Mar-2002 > - -
