Greetings Dialist
I have been slugging away at the third or forth prototype Helio-chronometer
and have  a problem. It tells time remarkably well but, Am I wrong in
expecting the bead of light emanating from the aperture on the alidade to
walk horizontally across the anelamma over the course of the day. or does it
cross the appropriate date mark on the anelamma at noon?
Dave Scott


lat.  42:56 N      long.  72:40 W
Wendell,MA.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger Bailey
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Sundial Mail List; DeAmicis-Roberts, Mike
Subject: Correction Epicycle


Hi Mike,

I promised to get back to you with some suggestions on corrections for the
Sunrise Seasonal Marker that you proposed for your analemmatic sundial.
Since this is of general interest, I hope you don't mind me posting this
note to the sundial mailing list as well.

First let's review the idea. You proposed a marker along the east west axis
that could be used to determine the position and time of sunrise and sunset.
When I did the calculations to check this proposal, I was surprised to find
that indeed there was such point. Lines through this marker and the dates on
the zodiac table extended one way shows you the azimuths of theoretical
sunrises or sunsets. Extending these lines the other way to the hour ellipse
of the dial tells you the times of sunrises or sunsets. This  seasonal
sunrise marker is a brilliant idea, a great addition to analemmatic
sundials.

There is a problem. The marker is not a point. All the lines do not go the
exact same point but were spread along the axis a short distance. In your
case of a large 9 meter or 30 ft diameter dial at your latitude, there is a
spread of 15 cm (6 "). The error grows with latitude, reaching unacceptable
size at latitudes like mine (51). Helmut Sonderegger suggested minimizing
the error by using 20.2 degrees as the reference base for calculations. This
works but I preferred to use the solstice as the base as this gave a
periodic error. The periodic nature of the error is natural. The straight
line approximation of circle should result in circle generated sine type
error curves. Then it struck me! Why not correct for this periodic error by
using a small circle projected onto the axis? We are in good company here.
When Ptolemy needed to correct for orbital anomalies, he used epicycles on
his perfect spheres. These epicycles are smaller diameter, or higher
frequency cycles on top of the main cycle, sort of like the harmonic terms
in a Fourier Series. What I am suggesting is not a true epicycle, a circle
on a circle generating "Spirograph" patterns, but it is close enough to use
the term.



I uses a small spreadsheet to calculate and plot the marker position of the
for dates and declinations throughout the year. Have a look at the
attachment "Epicycle.pdf". The graph shows as a function of the yearly cycle
the usual declination, equation of time, and now the sunrise/set azimuth for
your location. The black line on the expanded secondary axis is the position
of the seasonal marker throughout the year. It seems to be a perfect sine
curve. This is the curve that would be generated by the circle on the right
as you go around two rotations per year. The equinoxes are on top, giving
the maximum  marker position. The solstices are on the bottom showing the
minimum position. Your seasonal marker is now a simple circle, 15 cm in
diameter with dates marks around the circumference. Estimate the date; drop
a perpendicular from the circumference to the axis. This gives you the
precise position for the seasonal marker on that date.  For general
observations you can just sight across the circle. For precise readings,
establish a precise line from the zodiac table date to the date from the
epicycle on the axis.  What a great analogue computer! It is simple to
construct and easy to use.

The correction epicycle works very well to give you a precise answer for
sunset time and location. Now all we have to deal with are those devilish
mountains, the Diablo Range, polluting your eastern horizon.

Roger Bailey
Walking Shadow Designs
N 51  W 115

This is the second attempt post this message. The original that had a second
attachment of similar size that reviewed the seasonal marker concept must
have been stopped by the file size  filter. I hope this one gets through. It
takes about 6 seconds to transmit on my dial up modem connection.


-

Reply via email to