|
John,
You made the following two statements
1. I don't think noon marks should count when
we consider monumental sundial
statistics since there is no dial face indicating multiple hours, dates, altitudes, or anything else except a noon mark. 2. I also think we should disqualify sundials
that no longer exist. (Agustus and Mont Saint Michel)
Take my answer not too serious, but I don't agree with these statements.
See my remarks below.
1. A noon mark is a sundial, no doubt about
that.
There are a number of beautiful meridians in
churches and in fact they all are noon marks. I won't exclude them from any
sundial competition.
2. And what about the largest pancake? It's long
eaten but you have to bake a larger one to get a new record. A record
holds, even if the subject is disappeared.
On the other hand, parts of the dial of August
still exist, 8 meters below streetlevel !!!!! as Buchner wrote in his
book.
And the gnomon of Mont St. Michel still
is present. The cathedral, the island and the beach didn't
disappear.
In the former discussion I suggested the earth as
largest sundial.
As an astronaut on the moon it must have been a
beautiful sundial to look at and it can tell you the time at home.
Best wishes, Fer.
Fer J. de Vries
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iae.nl/users/ferdv/ Eindhoven, Netherlands lat. 51:30 N long. 5:30 E ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Carmichael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Monumental
Statistics? |
- Re: Monumental Statistics? fer j. de vries
- Re: Monumental Statistics? Robert Terwilliger
- Re: Monumental Statistics? Jean-Paul Cornec
- Re: Monumental Statistics? RKriegler
- Re: Monumental Statistics? Tony Moss
- Re: Monumental Statistics? John Carmichael
- Re: Monumental Statistics? GinnyandHalB
- Re: Monumental Statistics? John Carmichael
- RE: Monumental Statistics? Andrew James
- Re: Monumental Statistics? John Carmichael
- Re: Monumental Statistics? fer j. de vries
- Re: Monumental Statistics? GinnyandHalB
