Hello Frans,

Waugh's drawing 7.2 (on page 60) is wrong. If his initials weren't on the drawing, I'd think someone else might be responsible.

Mac Oglesby






Hi Anselmo &al,

In the dusty corner of a mail folder I found an old message that I still
wanted to respond to.

 > From:            Anselmo Pérez Serrada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > To:              "Sundial, Mailinglist" <[email protected]>
 > Subject:         Back again on thick gnomons
 > Date sent:       Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:44:33 +0100
 >
 > Hi there,
 >
 > (This is a remark I passed to make two weeks ago and then I
 > forgot completely )
 >
 > On 27th-JAN Rod Heil and Fer de Vries were discussing on
 > the thick-gnomon paradox, ie., the fact that sunrise hours and
 > sunset hours cross on the plate when the gnomon is thick so it
 > is not completely correct that these dials consist on two halves.
 > Do you remember?
 >
 > Well, my remark is as follows: of course Rod and Fer are right
 > and therefore Waugh is wrong in figure 5.4 of his book (page 41).
 > Anyway this is a mistake I have seen in many sundials and maybe
 > it is beause the error on the hour read is neglectible.
 >
 > Anselmo Pérez Serrada

I don't understand why Waugh would be wrong in fig. 5.4. He is so smart as
to include only hour lines from 6 am to 6 pm, and thereby avoids the common
error that was correctly signalled by you, Fer and Rod.

Kind regards,
Frans

======================
Frans W. Maes
53.1°N, 6.5°E
www.biol.rug.nl/maes/sundials/


-


-

Reply via email to