|
Often, when I have to answer to a questions as
that of Heiner Thiessen
when did sundials with gnomons parallel to the
planet's axis first
appear? I have a doubt on what to answer because there
are two different possible answers depending on we refer to sundials in which
the polar axis is fundamental and necessary for their working (sundials whose
operation would not be possible without a polar axis) and some ancient sundials
in which we have the presence of a polar axis that doesn't have an essential
function, but that was placed for a
different reason: geometrical, geographical, aesthetics, etc. I think that the classical sundials with polar
style, that mark the astronomic
hours (24 equal hours in the day)
and in which the shadow of the whole style marks the time, belong to the first
kind and are the 'modern' dials of Thiessens question . For this reason I think that a sundial with
temporary or seasonal hours cannot
belong to this type.
In them the hours are necessarily marked by the shadow of a
point or nodus and a possible polar (or horizontal, vertical, etc.) style is not useful to the operation.
I am therefore of the same opinion clearly
expressed by Frans W. Maes in his last message (7/14). Certainly the Greek and Roman knew the
astronomical hours and probably some Alexandrian astronomer understood the
possibility to make sundials with a polar style, but it doesn't exist, to my knowledge, any
written evidence and any sure archaeological find that bear witness to the
invention and to the construction of this kind of sundials before 1300-1400 AD
The only ancient sundials that I know in which "perhaps" a polar gnomon
was present, (without a specific function), are only 2 Roman sundials with
seasonal hours.
The first one is that described in
BSS-Bullettin - Vol. 14(iii) - September 2002 - pag. 111 (I thank here Karlheinz
Schaldach for his prompt and kind information). It is a Roman sundial of the
2nd century AD, found in
The presence in this sundial of a polar style
is however doubtful because the modern reconstruction of the clock, shown in a
photo, is wrong and can lay itself open to misinterpretation or to debatable
conclusions. In this reconstruction the authors have placed
a very thin polar style with an exaggerated length, at least 4 times the real
one : the value of the length found from simple calculation is only
Probably in this clock, as in other Roman
sundials, the nodus was the vertex of a gnomon having the shape of a pointed
prism, with its axis perpendicular to the plane of the sundial and therefore
necessarily parallel to the polar axis for geometrical reasons (and not for
functional ones) and it didn't have the shape of a thin and long style as in the
reconstruction.
The second Roman sundial, found in Pompei, with a pseudo polar gnomon has been described by Nicola Severino in a CD of recent publication: also in this case the gnomon, one of the few original found till now, has the shape of a short pointed prism (few cm), whose vertex was used to mark the temporary hours, and with its axis having a direction roughly toward the Norterh celestial pole . In the CD of Severino, devoted only to the
Roman sundials, there are several
original photos very detailed. Finally on the sundials of the ancient
Islam. The only refeence that the sundials with polar
style were invented in the tenth century is found in 4 lines of a paper delivered
by Prof. D. King (the most great expert of Arabic astronomy) at a Congress in Bucarest in 1981 and
republished by Variorum in 1987 (Islamic Astronomical Instruments pag.11 - lines
11-14) This reference is not repeated in any of the
following numerous writings of the Prof. King. To my knowledge one of the first Islamic
sundials with polar gnomon is the one made in the year 773H (1371-1372 AD) from the
astronomer Ibn al Shatir in
Regards Gianni Ferrari 44° 39'
N 10° 55' E |
- Armillary Dial heiner thiessen
- RE: Armillary Dial Andrew Pettit
- Re: Armillary Dial Frans W. Maes
- Re: Armillary Dial Gianni Ferrari
- Re: Armillary Dial heiner thiessen
- Re: Armillary Dial SchaldachK
- Re: Armillary Dial gf_merid
- Sundial accuracy Richard Mallett
- RE: Sundial accuracy Roger Bailey
- Re: Armillary Dial SchaldachK
- Armillary dial sandy macleod
- Re: Armillary dial Roger Bailey
- Re: Armillary dial Peter Mayer
- Re: Armillary dial Simon [illustratingshadows
