Dear Willy,

It is hard to find definitive information about clocks which
show Italian hours.  A number survive in Italy mostly in the
Rome area.  What I write now should not be taken as wholly
reliable!

Napoleon wanted French time everywhere of course and most
Italian hours clocks were changed during his era.  Papal
influence in the Rome area meant that a few Italian hours
clocks escaped Napoleon's attention!

The date given for the Paolo Uccello clock is 1443 and
you can be fairly sure that such a clock would be a very
poor timekeeper compared with clocks today.  The typical
daily error would greatly exceed the difference in time
of sunset from one day to the next so there would be no
need for any special mechanism.

Clocks of that period would have to be reset frequently,
using a sundial of course, and you could choose to set
it to Italian hours or French hours as you wished.

Of course, the clock weights were probably wound daily
anyway (and in early clocks the winding process stopped
power to the clock thereby contributing further to the
errors) so the added task of resetting the clock was
hardly a great one.

As clock time-keeping improved, the daily error reduced
and, by the Napoleonic era, the effort of resetting an
Italian hours clock daily would have started to seem a
little irksome.  I believe some of these later clocks
(18th century) did have special mechanisms but they
were pretty crude.

I can imagine clock-keepers being quite grateful to
Napoleon!

There is an interesting paper by Nicola Severino on
Italian hours clocks: `Le Ore Italiche... Perdute!'
Also, have a look at his web page...

http://www.nicolaseverino.it/orologio%20italiano.htm

You will some pictures of Italian hours clocks (I
took a couple of them myself).  The majority of these
clocks have dials running I, II, III, IIII, V and VI.
The single hand turns about four times a day if you 
are lucky.

I don't know of ANY that remotely keep to Italian
hours time today and most are in a very poor state
of preservation.

Frank H. King
Cambridge, U.K.

-

Reply via email to