Frank,

"The Ecclesiastical Calendar" is a wonderful book and absolutely essential
for anyone with an unhealthy interest in the labyrinthine workings of the
church calendar. It was written by the Bishop of Meath during his spare time
and describes in complete detail the development and theoretical foundations
of the ecclesiastical calendar. Unfortunately, it is difficult to find and I
have not seen a copy offered for sale but I did manage to borrow a copy from
the British Library which I returned with great reluctance.

Google Books have scanned a copy of the book and its description can be
found at:

http://books.google.com/books?id=qbA-rzFsIoMC

but it cannot be downloaded in UK - apparently for copyright reasons
although this seems highly conservative as the author died before
publication in 1877. However, anyone accessing Google Books from the US may
download a high-quality PDF copy of the book and I strongly recommend them
to do so.

Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank King
Sent: 16 March 2008 21:43
To: Mac Oglesby
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Easter

Dear Mac,

Many thanks for your message...

> If you can find the time, this mailing list member ...
> would much appreciate details about how you derived the list of dates.

I am glad you asked this question and equally glad that Patrick Powers has
supplied the algorithm!

I had it in my head that this algorithm was first published in Butcher's
Ecclesiastical Handbook in
1876 and I give this as the (incorrect) citation in one of my sets of
student exercises.

When I Googled "Butcher's Ecclesiastical Handbook"
all I got was a couple of references to plagiarised versions of my
exercises.  Tee hee!  I wouldn't have discovered my error had you not
prompted me to look for something else!

I first saw the algorithm in Meeus and now see that he gives the correct
citation "Butcher's Ecclesiastical Calendar, 1876".

There is a reasonably complete account in:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computus

One of my favourite books is "Calendrical Calculations"
by Edward M. Reingold and Nachum Dershowitz.  It is full of good jokes!

This book almost attributes the algorithm to Clavius and Lilius (key figures
in the Gregorian reform of the calendar).

Once you have implemented the algorithm you can then have fun determining
the length of the cycle.  A naive approach is to start at an arbitrary year
and look for the next year that has Easter on the same date.  You then look
to see whether the two following years match too.  They won't!  So you look
for the next matching year and keep going until you repeat indefinitely.
Your program will take a long time!!

"Calendrical Calculations" says:

  The dates of Easter repeat only after 5,700,000
  years, the least common multiple of the 19-year
  Metonic cycle, the 400 years it takes for the
  Gregorian calendar to return to the same pattern
  of days of the week, the 4000 years it takes for
  the Gregorian leap-year corrections to add up to
  30 days, and the 9375 years it takes for the
  correction to the Metonic cycle to amount to
  30 days.

If you get to understand the ecclesiastical moon and the ecclesiastical
vernal equinox you will wonder whether the algorithm works at all.  In fact
it does a remarkably good job at predicting "the first Sunday after the
first full moon after the vernal equinox" which is often given as the formal
definition of Easter.

What I should like to know is what is meant by Sunday!  Sunday begins at
different times in different places.  Could it mean Sunday as it is timed at
the longitude of Rome?

Enough from me!

Frank

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial





---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to