Thank you for checking the Python calculations against the results given by Orologi Solari. There a difference of less than 0.05 percent between the two calculations. (20.72373 vs. -20.71767, and 39.18438 vs. 39.20351) Is that to be expected and is it a meaningful level of precision?
On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:10 PM, [email protected] wrote: > The simulation tool of Orologi Solari gives the following results (see > attachment) : > azimuth = 20.72373 > height = 39.18438 > using DeltaT = 66.8 sec. > > Greetings. > Gian Casalegno > --------------------------------------------------- https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
