Jim, I agree with you about all but one detail : the current value of DeltaT.

The last measured values I know are the following 
(http://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/deltat.data) :

............................
2008  1   65.4574
2008  2   65.4868
2008  3   65.5152
2008  4   65.5450
2008  5   65.5781
2008  6   65.6127
2008  7   65.6288
2008  8   65.6370
2008  9   65.6493
2008 10   65.6760
2008 11   65.7097
2008 12   65.7461
2009  1   65.7768
2009  2   65.8025
2009  3   65.8237
2009  4   65.8595
2009  5   65.8973
2009  6   65.9323
2009  7   65.9509 

Therefore 72 s looks too much to me.

As the value of DeltaT cannot be known in advance but just assumed from 
previous measurements, Orologi Solari uses the following polynomial expansion 
as suggested by Espenak and Meeus 
(http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/deltatpoly2004.html) 
     ΔT = 62.92 + 0.32217 * t + 0.005589 * t^2
     where: t = y - 2000

that gives 66.7 s for 2010.

Regards.

Gian

----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 04/03/2010 3.48
A: <[email protected]>
Ogg: Fwd: Re: Re: Solar position calculator


Dipping my oar in the water, Delta-T is absolutely required for accurate 
calculations.  Almost all of the published polynomials for calculating orbital 
values are in the form of a polynomical based on the fraction of a Julian 
century for the epoch.  This variable, T, is calculated from the Julian day 
number.  The fraction of the Julian day number is the the fraction of the day 
since noon in dynamical time (which is now called Terrestrial Time, TT).  To 
calculate values for a given UT, you have to adjust Terrestrial (i.e. 
dynamical) time by the factor Delta-T = TT-UT.

So, if you want to do a calculation at noon UT, it is not for Julian day number 
xxx.5, but at xxx.5 - delta T (currently about 72 sec.).  Clearly, the 
adjustment is not a big deal for a contemporary sundial, but is very, very 
important for reproductions or studies for times far in the past.  Note that 
almost all values in the Astronomical Almanac are for 12 hr TT.  The only 
subject that uses UT is eclipses (I think).

I trust my program, "The Electric Astrolabe" which can be downloaded from my 
web site.  I trust it because of the hundreds of hours I have spent confirming 
it gives good answers and I know how it works.  It's hard to trust any program 
that doesn't tell you how the answers are calculated.

Best regards,

Jim

James E. Morrison
[email protected]
Astrolabe web site at http://astrolabes.org




------------ Forwarded message ------------
From: Aimo Niemi <[email protected]>
Date: Mar 3, 2010
Subject: Re: Re: Solar position calculator
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>


Hi


2010/3/3 [email protected] <[email protected]>



I think that no comparison can be made between different programs results 
without knowing the value of DeltatT that has been used.

I again think that DeltaT is not needed if we calculate apparent places and use 
UT.
Most accurate link capable for that (what I know)  is at
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi#results
If refraction is not calculated, the link gives
azimuth=200.7239 and altitude = 39.1824 (39.2031 if refraction is included)
Regards 
Aimo


Ephemeris tables usually declare the value of DeltaT that was used.
It is also worthy to note that for gnomonic applications all these results are 
more than correct :-)
Regards.
Gian

----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 03/03/2010 20.51
A: "John Goodman"<[email protected]>
Cc: "Sundial List"<[email protected]>
Ogg: Re: Solar position calculator 



Hi
I got following results from the link
http://www.roman-britain.org/astronomy/astro.htm#
which I believe is trustworthy

azimuth=200.7233  (20.7233 if south is the zeropoint)
altitude= 39.1827
I also tested the results with my own semi-accurate PcAllakka
with following results
azimuth=200.715 and altitude=39.188
Anyone interested can load the program from
http://pc-calculator.110mb.com/allakka/
or perhaps some of you is curious enough to visit my solar tracking sundial 
pages at
http://pc-calculator.110mb.com/tracker/solartracker.html
Greetings
Aimo Niemi

 

2010/3/3 John Goodman <[email protected]>

If anyone needs to make precise solar position calculations, the following 
software may be useful. There are a few caveats. The software is not a 
stand-alone application, it's a software library. The software library needs to 
be used from the command line and it runs using the Python programming 
language. 


I'm a Mac user and this is one of those rare occasions when an arcane set of 
requirements actually favors the Mac. While Macintosh users tend to be allergic 
to the command line, it has existed in the OS for the past 10 years. Python is 
there too, lurking under the surface.

I don't know enough about the PC, but clearly the command line is there and 
Python is available too. ( http://www.python.org/download/windows/ )

With all that preface, here's what the code can do. Once the necessary files 
are installed, you can type the following commands and see the following 
results:

>>> import datetime, solar
>>> d = datetime.datetime(2010, 3, 3, 18, 0, 0)
>>> lat = 42.0
>>> long = -71
>>> solar.GetAltitude(lat, long, d)
39.203509044804704
>>> solar.GetAzimuth(lat, long, d)
-20.717667802423591
>>>

Someone with an ephemeris can check these results. The format for datetime is 
"yyyy, mm, dd, hh, mm, ss", optionally followed by a number of microseconds. 
The time value entered is for UTC.

There are other functions for calculations that I haven't explored. You can 
read more about the software tools at http://pysolar.org/  Example uses are 
shown at http://wiki.github.com/pingswept/pysolar/examples  The software itself 
is at http://github.com/pingswept/pysolar/downloads

All of this software is the work of Brandon Stafford, who has generously 
offered his code free of charge to anyone who may find it useful. I have little 
experience with this software but, as much as I can, I'll be happy to help 
anyone trying to use it.

If there are any questions, I can pass them on to Brandon. I hope this is 
helpful to some.

---------------------------------------------------

https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial





---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial







---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial





---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to