Hi Peter,

A way to determine how good this sundial is to make a model using balsawood 
and a magnetic compass and/or with large plastic bottle tops.

Roderick Wall.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Mayer" <[email protected]>
To: "Chris Lusby Taylor" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Would this dial work?


> Hi Chris,
>
>   Thank you, Patrick and Edley for your analyses.
>   I'm away from home and without access to references.  I'm a bit 
> unwilling to
> entirely dismiss the dial.  I don't remember a discussion on this list of
> magnetic azimuth dials.  The Mayall's, I know, discuss them briefly in 
> their
> book.  In essence, as I recollect it, is that one lines up the dial with 
> the sun
> using the sides of the box in which it is enclosed and then reads the time 
> from
> the compass needle.  That is, it is backwards from our usual practice and
> expectations.  If Viestur's dial _is_ a magnetic azimuthal dial, how far 
> off
> would the equal angle dial be?
>    More broadly, does anyone have a better reference to the Magnetic 
> Azimuth
> Sundial than that in the Mayall's book?
>
> best wishes,
>
> Peter
>
> Quoting Chris Lusby Taylor <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Edley,
>> You are literally bending over backwards to try to justify this design. 
>> But
>> the patent does say the time scale and shadow pointer are.."both 
>> revolvable
>> about a common axis, said axis to be held in a vertical position during 
>> the
>> reading of the dial" (column 1, line 31). So it is a horizontal dial, not
>> equatorial.
>>
>> As for magnetic variation, it would be possible to allow for this to some
>> degree in the placing of the time zone marks. But the picture makes clear
>> that this was not in fact done, as they are all marked in 15 degree
>> intervals.
>>
>> The patent goes on to claim the watch can be used "over the whole world
>> without any difficulties depending on the number and the kind of the 
>> marks"
>> which is utter rubbish as it is totally useless in the tropics, for 
>> instance.
>> A southern-hemisphere version could be made by merely reversing the order 
>> of
>> the hour numbers - perhaps this is what he had in mind.
>>
>> It is well known that you can very approximately find north by pointing 
>> the
>> hour hand of a watch to the sun, mentally bisecting the angle between the
>> hand and noon to find north-south. This invention merely reverses the 
>> process
>> - given north-south, find the time. Why you wouldn't put a wristwatch
>> movement inside the case instead of the sundial escapes me.
>>
>> Regards
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Edley McKnight
>>   To: Chris Lusby Taylor ; [email protected] ;
>> [email protected]
>>   Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:16 AM
>>   Subject: Re: Would this dial work?
>>
>>
>>   Hi Peter, Chris, Patrick, and all.
>>
>>
>>   I agree with Chris if the plane of the watch is positioned 
>> horizontally,
>> but from the patent, there is no regard taken for positioning the watch 
>> other
>> than to magnetic north.  If the central axis of the watch was made 
>> parallel
>> with the earth's axis it would then function even better as an equatorial
>> dial.  Of course it would have to be held upside down in winter time and
>> would have the times backward.  One would also hope that magnetic 
>> deviation
>> was not too far off. ( It's about 20 degrees about our area. )  The two
>> threads function much like rotating a knife blade to minimise the shadow
>> thickness.  I wonder if many of them were ever made.
>>
>>
>>   Best Wishes!
>>
>>
>>   Edley.
>>
>>
>>
>>   > Hi Peter, Patricket al,
>>   > I've had a brief look at the patent which, by the way, dates from
>>   > 1953.
>>   > It is, as you supposed, an azimuth dial. The two shadow-casting
>>   > strings, f, are horizontal, one
>>   > above the other. The ring, d, must be turned until their shadows
>>   > coincide, in other words when
>>   > they indicate the sun's azimuth. The "time" is then indicated on an
>>   > equiangular scale that is
>>   > carried by a compass needle, so 12:00 is always on magnetic
>>   > North-South.
>>   > So, as a sundial, it is very primitive. Its only sophistication lies
>>   > in the way the time shown can be
>>   > offset to indicate any desired timezone. But the time shown will be
>>   > accurate only at noon, as it
>>   > supposes that the sun's azimuth changes by 15 degrees per hour.
>>   > When I first saw the diagram I imagined it was a bifilar dial. I
>>   > think you really could make a
>>   > passably accurate portable bifilar dial in a very similar manner,
>>   > but this is not it.
>>   > Regards
>>   > Chris
>>   > 51.4N 1.3W
>>   >
>>   >     ----- Original Message -----
>>   >     From: [email protected]
>>   >     To: [email protected]
>>   >     Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:48 PM
>>   >     Subject: Re: Would this dial work?
>>   >     For those having difficulty accessing the URL a better one for
>>   > this would be:
>>   >     http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2637108.pdf
>>   >
>>   >     Regards
>>   >
>>   >     Patrick
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >     -----Original Message-----
>>   >     From: Peter Mayer <[email protected]>
>>   >     To: 'sundial list' <[email protected]>
>>   >     Sent: Tue, Mar 2, 2010 2:05 pm
>>   >     Subject: Would this dial work?
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >     Hi,
>>   >     A while ago I came across US Patent 2637108 for a sundial watch
>>   > by
>>   >     Viesturs(http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2637108). The patent
>>   > charmingly
>>   >     suggests that it may be used 'for play and sport, where a good
>>   > mechanical watch
>>   >     is endangered by pressure, sand and water, and therefore not
>>   > always adapted to
>>   >     be carried around.  As play and sport are mostly exercised
>>   > during sunny weather,
>>   >     a portable sundial can well replace a mechanical watch on these
>>   > occasions".
>>   >     As may be seen from the copy of the illustration  which I've
>>   > attached, it
>>   >     appears to be an equal-angle dial.  It has a compass (label b)to
>>   > allow N-S
>>   >     alignment of the dial.  The shadow is cast by two vertical
>>   > threads (label f).
>>   >        After some pondering, I have concluded that the sundial may
>>   > be a form of
>>   >     magnetic azimuth dial, but this could well be wrong.
>>   >         My question is: would this dial work?
>>   >
>>   >     best wishes,
>>   >
>>   >     Peter
>>   >
>>   >      --------------------------
>>   >     Peter Mayer
>>   >     Politics Department
>>   >     The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
>>   >     Ph    : +61 8 8303 5606
>>   >     Fax   : +61 8 8303 3443
>>   >     e-mail: [email protected]
>>   >     CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
>>   >     -----------------------------------------------------------
>>   >     This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
>>   >     and contains information that may be confidential and/or
>>   >     copyright.  If you are not the intended recipient please
>>   >     notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete
>>   >     this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email
>>   >     by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
>>   >     prohibited. No representation is made that this email or
>>   >     any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is
>>   >     recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >     ---------------------------------------------------
>>   >     https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   > ---------------------------------------------------
>>   > https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>   >
>>   >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Peter Mayer
> Politics Department
> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
> Ph    : +61 8 8303 5606
> Fax   : +61 8 8303 3443
> e-mail: [email protected]
> CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
> and contains information that may be confidential and/or
> copyright.  If you are not the intended recipient please
> notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete
> this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email
> by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
> prohibited. No representation is made that this email or
> any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is
> recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2731 - Release Date: 03/09/10 
06:33:00

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to