Yes I would say that there is something wrong with the video.

 

The figure-eight shaped analemma is generally attributed to Grandjean de
Fouchy, a French mathematician who devised it around 1740 as a way to
regulate mechanical clocks by reference to the sun.    The device was called
the "mean time meridian" and was laid out on an interior the floor using
markers on two sides of a straight north-south noon meridian line.  A spot
of Sunlight was projected onto the floor thorough a ring gnomon outside the
building through a window.   The sun's image would cross the "mean time
meridian" line at exactly noon as measured by a perfectly accurate ideal
clock and could therefore be used to regulate an actual clock.  

 

The mean time meridian or analemma, therefore, was more of an invention than
a discovery and is only meaningful because of the juxtaposition of mean time
clocks and solar time.  When a clock is connected to a camera, the same
figure emerges in the sky if a photo is taken at the same time on successive
days.  

 

Since the analemma (mean time meridian) was originally developed with
reference to noon meridian line, it does have a logical connection to noon,
but the photos of the sun that trace out the figure in the sky are generally
not taken at noon. 

   

The slope of the figure is a function of latitude.  Its position (higher or
lower) above the horizon is a function of the time of day that the photos
are taken.  Morning and afternoons provide more interesting background
scenery. 

 

The values of the true sun's deviation from a mean sun were actually
explained and calculated by Ptolemy in the Almagest!  However the graphic
representation of these values that we call the analemma would probably
never have arisen without the intervention of a mechanical clock.     

 

The upper and lower limbs of the analemma do correspond to the two
solstices, but the crossover point when clock time deviates from solar time
is not related to the equinoxes.  This appears to have been a plausible (but
wrong) guess by somebody.      

 

Jack Aubert

 

From: sundial [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ruben
nohuitol
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 6:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Is there something wrong with this Cassiopeia video?

 

Hi, I watched this video,
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhqzW97_47w&feature=share&list=PLgLV7Kpk8Y6G
DdceXQCmgDLgbYSH7TeSt>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhqzW97_47w&feature=share&list=PLgLV7Kpk8Y6GD
dceXQCmgDLgbYSH7TeSt , of the Cassiopeia Project, in the 2th minute says the
equinox is marked for the cross point of the analemma, which I found not
match with my analemma but not with others, as show in pictures anexed.

 

Also found they say the marks are at noon, if noon means solar midday it is
not true, because the marks made a meridian line, not an analemma, and if
noon means 12:00 there´s no point to mention it, because you can make the
mark at any hour, just taking care is the same hour.

 

The video shows an left inclinated analemma, showing is at morning, not at
noon in any case. 

 

The image of the analemma is very close to the earth in case of a real photo
secuence, note the winter solstice point is very close of the earth, except
the case of the picture is taken very very close of the north pole, I
assume.

 

By the way, please tell me if there´s a method which shows graphicly the
equinoxes on a analemma, because I heard they need to make an analemma for
exactly know when the equinox are.

 

Thank´s 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to