Thank you all for the responses.  
 
Gianni, no account needs to be taken for refraction in the design of an 
ancient sundial if what they are designing is a way to break up the day into 
twelve hours defined as the movement of the sun 1/12 of the way across the sky. 
 
The dial itself will automatically show the hour with refraction included.  The 
sun and its shadow move in relation to us based on the actual conditions where 
we are.  
 
What I am trying to figure out is what that time would be on our clock and 
how off the temporal hours would be if the actual phenomena of refraction is 
taken into account in the calculations to figure out what the temporal hour 
would be on our clock. Since refraction actually exists.
 
When we think about sundials, we are trying to get the sundial to tell us 
what the real time is as defined by our clocks and we try to get them to be as 
close as possible. On an ancient sundial with temporal lines there is no need 
for the equation of time as what we are looking at, is the percentage of the 
sun’s movement across the sky.  That is the definition of the temporal hours if 
I am not mistaken.
 
David, I understand that azimuth doesn’t change but I am pretty sure that 
the declination changes and therefore the hour angle changes and I am trying to 
figure out what the formula is to get the hour angle to include the change in 
altitude.
 
Using Sæmundsson’s formula, 
, 
I get the the apparent altitude.  But how to I translate that change back into 
the hour angle.
 
Here is the code for the formula I thought would work.
 
newDeclin = Math.sin(lat_Rad) * Math.sin(apparent_altitude_Rad) - 
(Math.cos(lat_Rad)*Math.cos(apparent_altitude_Rad)*Math.cos(azimuth_Rad))
 
newDeclin = Math.asin(newDeclin);
        
var newHa = 
radToDeg(Math.asin(Math.cos(apparent_altitude_Rad)*Math.sin(azimuth_Rad)/Math.cos(newDeclin)));
 
As I mentioned, the results showed an almost twenty minute difference 
between what the temporal hour should be at the eleventh hour with refraction 
and without.
 


 
Again thanks for all the responses.
Noam Kaplan
 

From: Gianni Ferrari 
Sent: November 14, 2013 9:36 AM
To: LISTA INGLESE 
Subject: Re: temporal hour including refraction
 


No 
you're right!
In all the methods 
to calculate or draw sundials, 
geometric or analytic, the Sun is always 
considered punctiform, and reduced 
to its center, and no account is 
taken of refraction, of the lowering of 
the horizon (horizon dip), of other astronomical phenomena such 
as parallax, etc..
Sunset 
and sunrise (for the calculation of 
temporary or italic hours) are always the 
instants when the center of the Sun crosses the 
theoretical horizon.
Even Islamic 
astronomers, who well knew the phenomenon of 
refraction, do not take into account of it in 
the calculation of sundials and of the 
 prayers lines.
Best
Gianni Ferrari
 






---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

                                          
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to