Dear Steve,

I have read the replies to your enquiry and I
am not yet convinced by the responses to either
Part 1 or Part 2!

I'll restrict myself to Part 1, where it is
asserted...

   ...that Louis XIV issued some kind of edict
   that all clocks manufactured in France were
   to be Equation Clocks (that is, clocks that 
   showed solar time through a mechanical
   Equation of Time 'reversal' adjustment).

One point of note is that Louis XIV reigned
from 1643 to 1715 so this edict must have been
sometime in those 72 years.

Roderick Wall's reference...

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=d1oUAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA462&lpg=PA462&dq=all+clo
cks+manufactured+in+France+were+to+be+Equation+Clocks&source=bl&ots=ih4yWalJ9E&
sig=6u-sTxpfyTqZNPxRjfbAn7Q_ECk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW9oruqrbTAhVEGJQKHU-NDrs
Q6AEIIzAD#v=onepage&q=all%20clocks%20manufactured%20in%20France%20were%20to%20b
e%20Equation%20Clocks&f=false

says on page 462...

   Equation clocks were first made in France,
   about the year 1717, by Le Bon and Le Roy.

It seems unlikely that Louis XIV could have
insisted on something that didn't exist in
his time.

As king, Louis XIV no doubt had up-market
clocks in his palaces and he could simply
have instructed his clock-keepers to set
the clocks using a convenient sundial.

The solar day typically differs from 24 modern
hours by a small fraction of a minute and it
is unlikely that the clocks early in his reign
kept time to anything like that precision.
Frequent setting to sundial time would have
been required.

When he upgraded to pendulum clocks he may
have noticed that his clock-keepers had
changed their procedures...

I think the first EoT tables used for
"correcting" clocks were published by
Huygens in 1665 and better tables were
published by Flamsteed about 7 years
later.

Enthusiastic clock-keepers may have used
these tables and the king may not have
approved.  The only edict that he need
have issued would have been of the form:

  "Do not use the equation of time when
   setting the clocks."

I know how to dig out ancient English Acts
of Parliament but I do not know how to find
old French edicts.

 Please can someone nail down this edict?

Until I can read this edict in 17th century
French, I shall deem this to be another
example of a much-repeated falsehood
gaining widespread acceptance.

Now to ponder part 2!

Frank

Frank H. King
Cambridge, U.K.


---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to