how would we go with a TSR that did a dummy read every 15 mins or so? It only seems to be the first access that is slow.
Marcus On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:35:02 +0200, Edvin Syse wrote > I can confirm this - actually, remote disks on RDP is very > slow/ineffective alltogether. Even when the client and server are on > the same local network, the performance is lousy, especially > compared to nfs. > > I don't think keepalive TSR will resolve the issue, since it's not > the session itself that needs keepalive, but the spesific "share", > and I believe there are no settings for this. > > -- Edvin > > Craig Bender wrote: > > I think you'll find the same experience the first time accessing a > > remote drive even from the Windows RDP client on a PC. > > > > Troy Knabe wrote: > > > >> We have used the -r to access usb drives via rdesktop. I too have > >> found that the first time you access a USB drive it is very slow. I > >> have just written it off to the crummy Solaris auto-mounter. > >> > >> Troy > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcus Young > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:15 AM > >> To: SunRay-Users mailing list > >> Subject: [SunRay-Users] SunRay / RDP > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm interested to know if anyone has had experience with using the '-r > >> disk' > >> RDP pass thorugh with rdesktop (RDP) under SunRay / Solaris. We have > >> noticed that there is a several seconds delay the first time a share > >> is accessed from a Win 2003 session - subsequent accesses are faster - > >> although after a break of an hour or so the access is delayed again. > >> Is this an RDP issue (only creating the channel as required)? If so > >> does it make sense to use a 'keep alive TSR' on the windows platform? > >> > >> Marcus _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
