"Ralf K. Wiegand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not 100% clear on this. I have a Failover
> configuration, simple or redundant. In this
> configuration, are all servers do load balancing with
> out haveing a failure to force a load balance between
> the remaining servers? Are there any guidelines to
> configure Load Balancing to improve performance, not
> just in a failover state?
The servers in a group do load balancing unless they have been
have been marked "offline" by 'utadm -f'. An offline server
will not bid for new sessions. Only "online" servers take an
active part in the lottery that decides the location of a new
session.
There are no configuration or tuning parameters other than the
basic online/offline switch ('utadm -n' vs. 'utadm -f').
OttoM.
__
ottomeister
Disclaimer: These are my opinions. I do not speak for my employer.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
