You have to get some more inormation on what's going on at a connectivity level. I would use Ethereal and compare both communications. This will give a better understanding from the protocal/traffic perspective. I don't no much about Tarantella, but I think you should make sure you have all the patches on your Sol 8 box. Did you try this with a Solaris 9 install? Hope it helps.
Ralf --- Althea Booysen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Hope someone can help me with this. > > We've got a couple of users that's accessing some of > our application via > Tarantella on Sunray. The user's are complaining of > slow response when > using it on SunRay, but if they use the native > client of any Windows > machine it's fine! > > I've logged calls to both SUN and Tarantella, but > it's just ended up in > finger-pointing...Wonder what they gonna do know > that SUN has bought > Tarantella. > > Sunray Version: > > PKGINST: SUNWuto > NAME: Sun Ray server Core Software > CATEGORY: system, sunray > ARCH: sparc > VERSION: 2.0_37.b, REV=2002.12.19.07.46 > BASEDIR: /opt > VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > DESC: Sun Ray server, administration and user > commands > PSTAMP: SunOS_5.8_20040612101906 > INSTDATE: Jul 23 2004 02:41 > HOTLINE: Please contact your local service > provider > STATUS: completely installed > FILES: 165 installed pathnames > 9 shared pathnames > 16 directories > 122 executables > 4 setuid/setgid executables > 13096 blocks used (approx) > SunOS 5.9 Generic_117171-02 sun4u sparc SUNW, > Sun-Fire-480R > > Tarantella Version: > > Tarantella Enterprise 3 for SPARC Solaris 2.8+ > (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Andrew Fonts (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Hangul Fonts (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 ICL Fonts (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Oriental Fonts (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 SCO Term Fonts (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Platform Identity Pack for > SPARC Solaris 2.8+ > (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Security Pack for SPARC > Solaris 2.8+ (3.40.911) > Tarantella Enterprise 3 Windows Connectivity Pack > for SPARC Solaris 2.8+ > (3.40.911) > Architecture code: spso0508 > This host: SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-27 sun4u sparc > SUNW, Sun-Fire-280R > > Regards, > Althea > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 September 2005 11:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: SunRay-Users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 22 > > Send SunRay-Users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of SunRay-Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: screensaver behavior in NSCM ({Darkavich} > Steven Misrack) > 2. Re: screensaver behavior in NSCM > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 3. Re: THINC: can the Sun Ray be improved using > any of this? > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 4. Re: THINC: can the Sun Ray be improved using > any of this? > (Ivar Janmaat) > 5. Re: THINC: can the Sun Ray be improved using > any of this? > (Hagen Heiduck) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:37:05 -0700 > From: {Darkavich} Steven Misrack > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] screensaver behavior in > NSCM > To: SunRay-Users mailing list > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; > delsp=yes; format=flowed > > This happened to me when I went from 3.0 to 3.1 > beta. > > I had to delete and re-install 3.1 beta fresh. > I think the problem is a corrupt LDAP entry. > > The problem went away once I did that. (Although it > may have been > because I trashed the entire install) ;-) > > -Steve > > On Sep 13, 2005, at 13:11, Neal A. Lucier wrote: > > > {Darkavich} Steven Misrack wrote: > > > >> I had this same problem. We had to disable all > screen locking > >> because there was a nasty bug in SRSS2 patch -05 > that causes the > >> session to be terminated upon detaching when the > screen saver was > >> active. > >> GNOME seems to be very teprimental about when it > does the right > >> thing or even listens to what is in the screen > saver config. We > >> can't change it from GNOME. (Known bug that sun > has not fixed yet). > >> We have to tell our users to go into CDE, disable > the screen > >> saver/ screen lock if they don't want to detach > when it comes on. > >> I really think this should be user configurable, > and not dependent > >> on PAM. A simple Detach_Upon_Lock variable would > be nice. > >> > > > > We are having a whole slew of problems with NSCM. > I just turned it > > on over the weeked to improve load balancing, > which it has been > > doing an excellent job of; however... > > > > - with an extremely small subset of users after > they enter in > > their login name, the password dialog box never > appears, the DTU > > just sits there with a grey background and the dt > "X" mouse > > cursour, the DTU needs to be power cycled > > - in xscreensaver prefences under GNOME, > selecting the menu > > option, "blank now", detaches; unsetting the lock > the screen option > > and waiting the n minutes, detaches; unsetting the > lock the screen > > option and hitting the preview button, detaches; > setting the blank > > at 10 minutes and the lock at 30 minutes, detaches > after 10 minutes > > - one user doesn't show up in 'utwho', but does > show up in finger: > > bessel ~ % finger | grep dtlocal > > [snip] > > uxxxxx William J Uxxxxx dtlocal 2 > Mon 10:54 :17 > > [snip] > > bessel ~ % utwho -aH > > DISP Token User > > [snip] > > 16 auth.kxxxxx kxxxxx > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
