According to the THINC site, another key difference between Sun Ray and THINC is how the server is implemented. Sun Ray uses a customized X server while THINC uses a virtual display driver.
The virtual display driver approach is portrayed as a big performance and maintenance win. Would you care to comment on this approach?
Also, is there any technical reason this approach couldn't be used for a Windows version of the Sun Ray Server?
I know there are alternative ways of deploying Windows sessions to Sun Rays and Sun just bought Tarantella.
Thanks,
Curt
_______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
