>Some informal internal testing
Ivar, that's why I said it was informal testing, as opposed to something
more scientific :) Good and bad are obviously subjective, the
implication simply being that if you're going to buy a box from Sun
today to run a full desktop environment you're probably better off going
with Sparc IV or Opteron over a T1 machine.
I expect something more detailed will be out soon. I'm certainly
looking forward to getting some more info.
Chris
Paul Greidanus wrote:
That's an interesting thought.. is there any resonable way to quantify
SunRay performance in a way that you could compare Opteron vs
UltraSparcIII vs Niagara based systems? Would be cool to have the
SimDacenter tool have a metric for this as well...
Ivar Janmaat wrote:
It would be nice if Sun would provide some more information about what
to expect from their servers in a sunray environment when they launch
the systems. Maybe a Sunray benchmark is needed for this?
Or might sun focus on the niagara II to be the real sunray server?
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
Christopher Saul
Engagement Architect, Desktop & RFID
Sun Microsystems SEE
Mobile: +971 50 650 7041
Office: +971 4 366 2634
Ext: x12634
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
