Hi, Appreciate some help from the list on the following questions.
1. We like to understand if the logs indicate any configuration problem or bug. We don't understand why it is looping. Edgeport/21 is a supported USB-to-Serial/Parallel converter. 2. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot further. We need to quickly identify the problem as this is affecting our development. 3. Any information on how the Edgeport works in a failover configuration. We are thinking of reverting back to standalone mode and use utswitch instead for backup purposes. What are the differences with respect to how the device manager behaves. A better understand would help. Thanks in advance. Rgds, Archer --- ArcherLogic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The model is edgeport/21 consisting of 2 serial and 1 parallel. > Bob Doolittle wrote: > > Hi, > > What model of Edgeport adapter are you > trying to use? Is it on the list of supported > devices? > > Unfortunately, since there is no standardization > around serial/parallel USB adapters, each unit > is proprietary, and even within a vendor's offerings > the models are most often incompatible. We have > ported some specific models from specific vendors. > > -Bob > > ArcherLogic wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >My mail is still awaiting to be released > >by the sunray-users at filibeto.org admin. because > >the log file is slightly exceeds the size > limitation > >for the mail. > > > >This is the version without the log file. > > > >I like to find out what are the reasons that may > cause > >the following behavior > > > > > >SPARC system, /etc/release: > >"Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a SPARC" > >Patched with SRSS patch ID: 120879-01 > > > >SUNWuto VERSION: 3.1_32,REV=2005.08.24.08.55 > > > >DTU is SunRay1G - Firmware > >3.1_32.08,REV=2005.08.24.08.55 > > > >Attached to the DTU is an EdgePort. The SunRay > >server are in Failover mode. We are testing > failover > >in this scenario. The debug utparalleld is looping > >trying to create the device files. > > > > > >Summarised (see attached log for detail debug): - > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.774691 SGT dm_device: missing 3 > units. > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.774951 SGT dm_unit: got 1 units > of 3 > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.774994 SGT dm_unit: missing 2 > units > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.775208 SGT dm_unit: got 2 units > of > > 3 > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.775240 SGT dm_unit: missing 1 > units. > > > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.775434 SGT dm_unit: got 3 units > of 3 > > > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.776276 SGT ut_mknode: > > > > > >/tmp/SUNWut/units/IEEE802.0003bad75620/devices/usb at 1/hub at 3/1608,b at 1 > > > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.776475 SGT ut_chowner: > /tmp/SUNWut/units/IEEE802.0003bad75620/devices/usb at 1/hub at 3/1608,b at 1 > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.776574 SGT ut_mklink: > path=/tmp/SUNWut/units/IEEE802.0003bad75620/dev/printers/1608b-64 > symbolic name: 1608b-64 > > > >loops...again... > > > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.778252 SGT dev_key_owner: new > owner is [<no_one>]. > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.778285 SGT dm_device: missing 3 > units. > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.977672 SGT dm_unit: got 1 units > of 3 > >2006.03.30 23:03:47.977715 SGT dm_unit: missing 2 > units. > >... > >... > >.. > > > > > >Any advise. What does it mean by > >new owner is [<no_one>] et cetera. This is causing > >my application to not being able to open the device > >file for out (unable to lock the file error) > > > >Rgds, > >Archer > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
