On 9/7/06, Kenneth Bourn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a known issue with the Sun Ray 2FS with two identical but "unsupported" monitors attached with a 'utresadm' definition for the monitor type explicitly defined for the 2FS DTU?
There's a known issue with 'utresadm' and the 2FS regardless of whether the timing is a built-in or a custom definition. The issue is that utresadm knows nothing about the second output on the 2FS, so it ends up forcing the timing for the first output only and sizing the session's X server to fit entirely on the first head. This is being worked on but i don't know when the fix will be available. It's very unlikely to be in the next 3.1 patch, it might just possibly be in the patch after that. Until the fix is available the best you can do is to use 'utresadm' to force the timing on the first head and then use 'utxconfig' to force the X desktop dimensions so that the X desktop is large enough that it spills over onto the second head. This assumes that you can live with different timings on the two heads: the second head will be driven with whichever built-in timing is supported by the monitor and maximises the amount of X desktop that will be presented on the monitor. Try 'utxconfig -r 2880x900', log out and log in again. OttoM. __ ottomeister Disclaimer: These are my opinions. I do not speak for my employer. _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
