It can be an issue if the MTU for the network is not 1500. Can you test
it out?
Is this a T2000? If so your Xsun process is taking up one whole CPU.
Kevin Burtch wrote:
> Only one user on the system, both processes below belong to him:
> PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
> 14955 root 33M 31M cpu17 10 0 0:02:42 4.0% Xsun/1
> 15298 utcu0 11M 9560K sleep 59 0 0:00:05 0.1% uttsc-bin/2
>
> utcapture output:
> # TERMINALID TIMESTAMP TOTAL PACKET TOTAL LOSS BYTES SENT
> PERCENT LOSS LATENCY
> 00144f4892dc 20061012175713 9199 0 12729082
>
> We just upgraded to a beta version of the Sun Ray 2 firmware (that
> fixes other issues) in a shot-in-the-dark attempt to see if it would
> help (it didn't, no change).
>
> I don't believe the MTU should be an issue, as the Sun Ray Server and
> DTUs are all on the same private VLAN and I believe on the same
> switch.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
>
> On 10/11/06, Craig Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kevin,
>> Does utcapture show anything. Have you tested the MTU.
>>
>> While this is happening, what does Xsun (runs as root) for this
display
>> show and what does uttsc-bin show? Can you get me some prstat -u UID
>> and prstat -u root info (try to correlate the display for me to
the Xsun
>> process).
>>
>> Is there anyway you can help us recreate this?
>>
>> Kevin Burtch wrote:
>> >
>> > Both front-end and back-end (Sun Ray VLAN and LAN interfaces)
are set
>> > to auto resulting in 100/full on both the Suns and the switch ports
>> > they are connected to.
>> > (they don't have gig-e switches at that site)
>> >
>> > Output of netstat -i shows zero errors.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> > On 10/11/06, *Alejandro Soler* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > *Look at the network switch configuration for sunray, and
the type
>> > of conecction (if its full duplex, or half duplex)*
>> >
>> > *Cheers *
>> >
>> > *On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:11:53 +0000, Ross Morrison wrote*
>> >
>> >
>> > > Kevin,
>> > >
>> > > I think I may have seen something similar to what you
describe.
>> > We had three Sun Rays connected via a gigabit switch to a V440
>> > machine. When we used certain graphic intensive programs
the Sun
>> > Ray's would become unresponsive and in some cases they would
lose
>> > connection to the server entirely. We resolved the issue by
>> > limiting the network port on the V440 to 100MB to match that of
>> > the Sun Rays and this resolved the issue.
>> > >
>> > > May not be the same but something to check?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Ross
>> > >
>> > > Kevin Burtch wrote:
>> >> This is a tough one.
>> >> > We have a deployment on an island, very remote, using some
>> in-house
>> >> > developed software managing sensitive data.
>> >> > I mention this, as I have never personally *seen* the issue,
>> and I
>> >> > won't be able to. We cannot move the software and data
here for
>> >> > reasons I can't go into.
>> >> >
>> >> > The problem is:
>> >> > When a user generates a report, cells are being redrawn
on the
>> >> screen
>> >> > (that's all I can get out of them). When this happens, they
>> lose
>> >> all
>> >> > responsiveness with the mouse and keyboard until the program
>> >> finishes
>> >> > the report.
>> >> >
>> >> > CPU load is minuscule (single user on a T1000) on the Sun
Ray
>> >> Server.
>> >> > The software itself is running on a Windows Terminal Server.
>> If run
>> >> > directly, or remotely via a windows PC, it runs in 15
seconds
>> >> with no
>> >> > loss in interactiveness.
>> >> > When run via a Sun Ray, it takes a minimum of 80 seconds and
>> all
>> >> > interactiveness is lost.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I've tried:
>> >> > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.0 (released version)
>> >> > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.1 (beta version)
>> >> > rdesktop 1.4.1
>> >> > rdesktop 1.5
>> >> > Applying every patch I can find related to X.
>> >> >
>> >> > All have the same problem.
>> >> > This actually surprised me, as the symptoms are exactly the
>> same as
>> >> > those I DID see fixed in Connector 1.1 (we had that
problem at
>> >> another
>> >> > site). Only the trigger seems to be different (it's not
>> >> scrolling as
>> >> > far as I know, just rapid repaints of cells).
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyone have any ideas?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Kevin
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > SunRay-Users mailing list
>> >> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SunRay-Users mailing list
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SunRay-Users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> SunRay-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
