I'm all for zone support, but I would rather find away to consolidate
multiple servers into one zone/copy of SRSS if it was possible, lot of
extra overhead you could with without.
It is great to run software within a zone just for the fact you can move
zones between systems, long as you stay within either x86 or SPARC
architectures. Also it would of been great to run SRSS in a 'CAM zone'
and a 'Desktop zone' for a couple of my deployments. Need 4 servers if
you want to have redundancy in that setup currently, if you want a
supported configuration that is. Even when the new software comes out
with the policy changes, it's nice to keep desktop users isolated from
the rest.. Also, as users increase you can move the zones to dedicated
servers with the new sizing requirements.
One can dream can't they?
- Trev
Sean Clarke wrote:
But what would stop a setup whereby there is one SRSS per zone - each
SRSS instance knows only about it's zone, indeed it has no concept of a
zone - sort of consolidating 10 SRSS servers on one machine - each SRSS
instance is zone installed.
Does anyone else think this is a useful feature?
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
