Thank you for the input Bob.  In regards to the work around I mentioned
below, I first delete the multihead group from the server then I get the
login screen on the secondary and after attaching the keyboard mouse to
the secondary I can login and run utswitch.  Works for so long as the
secondary isn't powercycled.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:53 PM
> To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Multihead on non-failover group
> 
> Bemis, Suzanna K wrote:
> > I have a Solaris Sunray Server on the same LAN as a Linux Sunray 
> > Server with the Solaris Sunray Server acting as the dhcp 
> server too. 
> > They are not in failover.  There are many multihead groups 
> configured 
> > on the Solaris Server which I've configured on the Linux 
> Server too.  
> > These multiheads are configured using Sunray 1's and 1G's.  When a 
> > user switches from the Solaris server to the Linux server 
> by any means 
> > possible, i.e. utswitch, utselect (Enter Server), the 
> primary sunray 
> > switches to the Linux server but the secondary doesn't.
> 
> Yes, this is "by design" to protect people against "roaming" 
> multihead groups among FOGs with potentially inconsistent 
> multihead configurations.
> You could imagine forwarding a multihead group to a FOG 
> without a multihead configuration - you'd wind up with 
> secondary heads (typically with no
> keyboards) showing greeter sessions
> (i.e. individual sessions of their own) that were 
> inaccessible.  This was considered sufficiently unpleasant to 
> warrant defeating multihead roaming entirely, back in the 
> days when we were first experimenting with roaming between FOGs.
> 
> > Work around is
> > done by plugging a keyboard/mouse into the secondary and running 
> > utswitch, etc to get to the Linux server.
> 
> I don't see how this can work, if you have the same multihead 
> configuration everywhere.
> Secondary heads will merely show the "wait for primary" icon 
> and you won't be able to run utswitch or anything else on them.
> 
> I'm afraid there is no workaround for this situation, sorry.  
> I suppose if you had the new 4.0 manual configuration 
> firmware you could change the server list to the destination 
> group, but that would be very cumbersome and possibly risky 
> (a typo would prevent the Sun Ray from connecting anywhere 
> until somebody intervened).
> 
> We do have an RFE (6581172) open and if there was sufficient 
> customer (or sales) interest we could implement it in a 
> future release.  What has been considered is to allow 
> multihead groups to carry their own configuration information 
> along with them when "roaming" between FOGs, and use it in 
> preference to any local configuration (or lack thereof).  
> This would avoid inconsistencies in multihead configuration 
> in remote FOGs.
> 
> -Bob
> 
> > Whenever the secondary sunray
> > server is power cycled or the Linux server is rebooted, then the 
> > secondary goes back to the Solaris Server.  I realize that 
> if I broke 
> > up the addresses for DHCP and assigned IP's from the Linux sunray 
> > server to the secondary sunray's I'd get multihead on the 
> Linux sunray 
> > server, but what if I wanted then to go back to the Solaris sunray 
> > server at that workstation?  I've tried changing "macros" in the 
> > dhcpmgr on the Solaris server but that seems to break the 
> authentication all together.
> > 'utmhadm -a' command on the Linux sunray server indicates 
> > "<secondaryMAC> not in admin database", but 'utdesktop' 
> says it is.  I 
> > deleted the utmhadm group and readded it, then it doesn't complain 
> > about "not in admin database".
> >
> > Point is I want to maintain both the Solaris Sunray Server 
> and Linux 
> > Sunray Server in non-failover but be able to switch back and forth 
> > between Solaris and Linux depending on user.  Would AMGH 
> help at all?  
> > I will be deploying SunRay 2fs's soon, and they work great in the 
> > multihead capacity, but in the meantime I need the 1's and 
> 1G's to be 
> > flexible.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Suzie
> >
> >   
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to