Matt,

If you are in a hurry, NEC has a thin client product that does a great
job of dealing with video and audio. In a couple of months you should
be able to use it with your VoIP Cisco server to act as your desk
phone too. http://www.necam.com/vpcc/US100.cfm

The only reason I haven't switched to it is because they do not
support a full Linux desktop like SRSS does. Plus, I know Sun (at
least at one time) had a couple of positions available for a coders to
develop a codec on the SunRay client device. So, it may be right
around the corner! :)

The NEC supports flash, windows media and mpeg4 but anything else will
come across just as bad as you see it now on the SunRay.

On 8/14/07, Aaron Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Sunrays are thin clients so, they're only going to go as fast as the
> server(s) and LAN supporting them can handle.
>
>  In my experience though Youtube videos are almost always poor quality to
> start with but I find them to be not  much worse than if I was viewing them
> on an actual Desktop versus the SunRay. Of course I have Squid setup to
> block Youtube from my users cause they don't need to be wasting the
> bandwidth watching videos when they should be working. I have a few
> exceptions though since some of our employees have to watch videos of Music
> artists to do their job. None of them has ever complained though so it must
> be good enough for them to do their job. Only thing I can think of to get
> Youtube work better for me was to install Flash 9 for Solaris.
>
>  In general SunRays aren't designed for watching video.
>
>  I believe USB is USB 1.1 speed, so yeah it's slow for large files.
>
>  Matthew Burger wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  Has anyone tried to do any streaming video on the Sun Ray setup?  I have
> tried several things, such as, YouTube, Real, etc. and they are all very
> terrible.  I even moved a bottled Real Player video to my home folder and it
> displayed very poorly on the DTU.
>
>  Any help and/or ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
>  Also, to that same extent.... Has anyone had incredibly poor performance
> with using USB thumb drives and such?  A generic 1MB photo takes almost a
> complete minute to open.  Is this normal or is there something that I am
> missing?
>
>  Thanks again,
>
>  Matt
>  ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to