Anyone can help to explain if the PC/SC SRCOM Bypass 2.0 is preferred over PCSCLITE1.0?
Am using the files from: http://www.sun-rays.org/srss.html - PC/SC-lite 1.0 for Solaris 10 11/06 SPARC Platform<http://www.sun-rays.org/add-ons/pcsclite/1.0/pcsclite_sparc.zip> - PC/SC-lite 1.0 for Solaris 10 11/06 x86 Platform<http://www.sun-rays.org/add-ons/pcsclite/1.0/pcsclite_i386.zip> Should I be using this? - PC/SC SRCOM Bypass 2.0 Revenue Release (SPARC)<http://www.sun-rays.org/add-ons/SUNWsrcbp_2.0.zip> - PC/SC SRCOM Bypass 2.0 Revenue Release (x86)<http://www.sun-rays.org/add-ons/SUNWsrcbp_2.0_x86.zip> Seemed like I am seeing the following in the -r scard:on when I uttsc to the Windows XP VM when using pcsclite. --- winscard_msg.c268:() Error:Didnt get CONNECT OK message from instance. winscard_msg.c:270:() Received following buffer instead:AUTHENTICATION FAILURE winscard_msg.c272:(): Closing FD:6 winscard_clnt.c:614:() SCardEstablishContext(): Client setup err winscard_msg.c268:() Error:Didnt get CONNECT OK message from instance. winscard_msg.c:270:() Received following buffer instead:AUTHENTICATION FAILURE winscard_msg.c272:(): Closing FD:6 winscard_clnt.c:614:() SCardEstablishContext(): Client setup err winscard_msg.c268:() Error:Didnt get CONNECT OK message from instance. winscard_msg.c:270:() Received following buffer instead:AUTHENTICATION FAILURE winscard_msg.c272:(): Closing FD:6 winscard_clnt.c:614:() SCardEstablishContext(): Client setup err
_______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
