Hi all,
The issue is that authd no longer understands that 192.168.128.0
is an interconnect. It's possible that enabling NIS has caused
the machine to get different results for things like netmasks.
That could be enough to confuse 'pntadm', therefore 'utadm',
therefore authd.
Andreas, when you enabled NIS did you change the order of
the right-hand side of any lines in nsswitch.conf? What does
'getent netmasks 192.168.128.0' show? What does 'pntadm -L'
show? What does 'utadm -p' show?
I went into /etc/nsswitch.conf and changed the following lines from
networks: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files
protocols: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files
netmasks: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files
to
networks: files nis [NOTFOUND=return]
protocols: files nis [NOTFOUND=return]
netmasks: files nis [NOTFOUND=return]
and boom, "getent netmasks 192.168.128.0" returns the expected value
and the login screen appears.
However, I still can't login, at least not as an account aquired from
the NIS master. I get
Login incorrect; please try again
I attached my current /etc/nsswitch.conf. Any idea?
Some addtional info. In /var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages I get
Oct 10 21:53:45 ultra20 dtlogin[12333]: [ID 118685 user.info]
pam_sunray_amgh::[DPY=2] AMGH_SUMMARY: token=pseudo.0003babbaa64,
username=celine, AMGH_Done?=NO(Local Session), Details=AMGH is not
configured., AMGH_Target=*NONE*
Oct 10 21:53:46 ultra20 dtlogin[12333]: [ID 118685 user.info]
pam_sunray_amgh::[DPY=2] AMGH_SUMMARY: token=pseudo.0003babbaa64,
username=*NONE*, AMGH_Done?=NO(Local Session), Details=AMGH is not
configured., AMGH_Target=*NONE*
now when trying to login as a NIS user!? What does that mean?
Thanks,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
