Kent Peacock wrote:
Collins, Alex wrote:
Hi All.
I appreciate that this is not supported and may be beyond the bounds
of what
can be done.
We have 2 sites (Chelmsford and Cambridge) and 3 V210's (2 in
Chelmsford 1 in
Cambridge) running SRSS4.
The Sunray Interfaces is connected to a Vlan on each site before
being sent
over the network to the terminals.
The plan is to join the 2 Vlan's together with a GRE Tunnel.
I have dropped the MTU to 1480 to allow for the overheads in the GRE
Tunnel.
The FOG is created and working in Chelmsford. I can see all the
Terminals on both sites in the Web admin. What I cant do is see the
Server(s) at the remote site or get the terminals
to connect through the Tunnel.
Somewhat scrappy Network diagram http://195.194.255.82/Sunray2.gif
This looks like a really, really unsupported configuration. Since the
Sun Rays are on private interconnects, to form a failover group, they
have to be on the same subnet, and within a broadcast or multicast
domain. Here, you have two subnets configured.
Then I apologize for my previous comment. I thought that if the two
subnets would route to each other and support IP multicast forwarding
this would be OK. Kent would know best here. If you could join the
VLANs you'd be fine (or at least it would work - whether it would work
*well*, given the asynchronous latencies, is a different question but
presumably you're aware of those issues).
-Bob
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
